linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Mika Penttilä" <mpenttil@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: use current as mmu notifier's owner
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 09:40:41 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814124041.GD699432@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814072045.3637192-3-mpenttil@redhat.com>

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:19:26AM +0300, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> When doing migration in combination with device fault handling,
> detect the case in the interval notifier.
> 
> Without that, we would livelock with our own invalidations
> while migrating and splitting pages during fault handling.
> 
> Note, pgmap_owner, used in some other code paths as owner for filtering,
> is not readily available for split path, so use current for this use case.
> Also, current and pgmap_owner, both being pointers to memory, can not be
> mis-interpreted to each other.
> 
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com>
> ---
>  lib/test_hmm.c   | 5 +++++
>  mm/huge_memory.c | 6 +++---
>  mm/rmap.c        | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
> index 761725bc713c..cd5c139213be 100644
> --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
> +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
> @@ -269,6 +269,11 @@ static bool dmirror_interval_invalidate(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
>  	    range->owner == dmirror->mdevice)
>  		return true;
>  
> +	if (range->event == MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR &&
> +	    range->owner == current) {
> +		return true;
> +	}

I don't understand this, there is nothing in hmm that says only
current can call hmm_range_fault, and indeed most applications won't
even gurantee that.

So if this plan relies on something like the above in drivers I don't
see how it can work.

If this is just some hack for tests, try instead to find a solution
that more accurately matches what a real driver should do.

But this also seems overall troublesome to your goal, if you do a
migrate inside hmm_range_fault() it will generate an invalidation call
back and that will increment the seqlock and we will loop
hmm_range_fault() again which rewalks.

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-14 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-14  7:19 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Migrate on fault for device pages Mika Penttilä
2025-08-14  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: use current as mmu notifier's owner Mika Penttilä
2025-08-14 12:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-08-14 12:53     ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-14 13:04       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-14 13:20         ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-14 14:11           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-14 17:00             ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-14 17:20               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-14 17:45                 ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-15  5:23                   ` Alistair Popple
2025-08-15  7:11                     ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-19  4:27                       ` Balbir Singh
2025-08-19  4:33                         ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-14  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: unified fault and migrate device page paths Mika Penttilä
2025-08-21  4:30   ` Balbir Singh
2025-08-21  5:10     ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-22  5:02       ` Alistair Popple
2025-08-14  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm:/migrate_device.c: remove migrate_vma_collect_*() functions Mika Penttilä
2025-08-14  7:19 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm: add new testcase for the migrate on fault case Mika Penttilä
2025-08-15 11:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Migrate on fault for device pages Balbir Singh
2025-08-15 11:44   ` Mika Penttilä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250814124041.GD699432@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpenttil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox