linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Gu Bowen <gubowen5@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Lu Jialin <lujialin4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Fix possible deadlock in console_trylock_spinning
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:56:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250813155616.d7e5a832ce7cda7764942d10@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250813085310.2260586-1-gubowen5@huawei.com>

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:53:10 +0800 Gu Bowen <gubowen5@huawei.com> wrote:

> Our syztester report the lockdep WARNING [1]. kmemleak_scan_thread()
> invokes scan_block() which may invoke a nomal printk() to print warning
> message. This can cause a deadlock in the scenario reported below:
> 
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(kmemleak_lock);
>                                lock(&port->lock);
>                                lock(kmemleak_lock);
>   lock(console_owner);
> 
> To solve this problem, switch to printk_safe mode before printing warning
> message, this will redirect all printk()-s to a special per-CPU buffer,
> which will be flushed later from a safe context (irq work), and this
> deadlock problem can be avoided. The proper API to use should be
> printk_deferred_enter()/printk_deferred_exit() if we want to deferred the
> printing [2].
> 
> This patch also fixes other similar case that need to use the printk
> deferring [3].
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c

I'm not sure which kernel version this was against, but kmemleak.c has
changed quite a lot.

Could we please see a patch against a latest kernel version?  Linus
mainline will suit.

Thanks.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-13  8:53 Gu Bowen
2025-08-13 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-13 22:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-08-14  2:33   ` Gu Bowen
2025-08-14 13:08     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-14 13:56       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-14 14:38         ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-14 14:54           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-14 17:00             ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-18  2:24       ` Gu Bowen
2025-08-18  5:54         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250813155616.d7e5a832ce7cda7764942d10@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gubowen5@huawei.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox