From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: fix accounting of memmap pages for early sections
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 09:03:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250806090320.wdt4zsfiambtgkvy@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250804151328.2326642-1-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 05:13:27PM +0200, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
>memmap pages can be allocated either from the memblock (boot) allocator
>during early boot or from the buddy allocator.
>
>When these memmap pages are removed via arch_remove_memory(), the
>deallocation path depends on their source:
>
>* For pages from the buddy allocator, depopulate_section_memmap() is
> called, which should decrement the count of nr_memmap_pages.
>
>* For pages from the boot allocator, free_map_bootmem() is called, which
> should decrement the count of the nr_memmap_boot_pages.
>
>Ensure correct tracking of memmap pages for both early sections and non
>early sections by adjusting the accounting in section_deactivate().
>
>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>Fixes: 15995a352474 ("mm: report per-page metadata information")
>Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
>---
>v2: consider accounting for !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP.
>
> mm/sparse.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>index 3c012cf83cc2..b9cc9e548f80 100644
>--- a/mm/sparse.c
>+++ b/mm/sparse.c
>@@ -680,7 +680,6 @@ static void depopulate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> unsigned long start = (unsigned long) pfn_to_page(pfn);
> unsigned long end = start + nr_pages * sizeof(struct page);
>
>- memmap_pages_add(-1L * (DIV_ROUND_UP(end - start, PAGE_SIZE)));
> vmemmap_free(start, end, altmap);
> }
> static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
>@@ -856,10 +855,14 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> * The memmap of early sections is always fully populated. See
> * section_activate() and pfn_valid() .
> */
>- if (!section_is_early)
>+ if (!section_is_early) {
>+ memmap_pages_add(-1L * (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages * sizeof(struct page), PAGE_SIZE)));
> depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
>- else if (memmap)
>+ } else if (memmap) {
>+ memmap_boot_pages_add(-1L * (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages * sizeof(struct page),
>+ PAGE_SIZE)));
> free_map_bootmem(memmap);
>+ }
The change here is reasonable. While maybe we still miss the counting at some
other points.
For example:
a.
sparse_init_nid()
__populate_section_memmap()
If !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, and sparse_buffer_alloc() return NULL, it
allocate extra memory from bootmem, which looks not counted.
b.
section_activate()
populate_section_memmap()
If !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, it just call kvmalloc_node(), which looks not
counted.
Do I missed something?
>
> if (empty)
> ms->section_mem_map = (unsigned long)NULL;
>--
>2.48.1
>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-04 15:13 Sumanth Korikkar
2025-08-04 15:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 9:03 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2025-08-06 12:46 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-08-06 14:31 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250806090320.wdt4zsfiambtgkvy@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox