From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] dma-mapping: migrate to physical address-based API
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 12:36:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250805153606.GR26511@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJArFNkuP8DJIdMY@casper.infradead.org>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 04:37:56AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 12:59:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Matthew, do you think it makes sense to introduce types to make this
> > clearer? We have two kinds of values that a phys_addr_t can store -
> > something compatible with kmap_XX_phys(), and something that isn't.
>
> I was with you up until this point. And then you said "What if we have
> a raccoon that isn't a raccoon" and my brain derailed.
I though it was clear..
kmap_local_pfn(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT)
phys_to_virt(phys)
Does not work for all values of phys. It definately illegal for
non-cachable MMIO. Agree?
There is a subset of phys that is cachable and has struct page that is
usable with kmap_local_pfn()/etc
phys is always this:
> - CPU untranslated. This is the "physical" address. Physical address
> 0 is what the CPU sees when it drives zeroes on the memory bus.
But that is a pure HW perspective. It doesn't say which of our SW APIs
are allowed to use this address.
We have callchains in DMA API land that want to do a kmap at the
bottom. It would be nice to mark the whole call chain that the
phys_addr being passed around is actually required to be kmappable.
Because if you pass a non-kmappable MMIO backed phys it will explode
in some way on some platforms.
> > We clearly have these two different ideas floating around in code,
> > page tables, etc.
> No. No, we don't. I've never heard of this asininity before.
Welcome to the fun world of cachable and non-cachable memory.
Consider, today we can create struct pages of type
MEMORY_DEVICE_PCI_P2PDMA for non-cachable MMIO. I think today you
"can" use kmap to establish a cachable mapping in the vmap.
But it is *illegal* to establish a cachable CPU mapping of MMIO. Archs
are free to MCE if you do this - speculative cache line load of MMIO
can just error in HW inside the interconnect.
So, the phys_addr is always a "CPU untranslated physical address" but
the cachable/non-cachable cases, or DRAM vs MMIO, are sometimes
semantically very different things for the SW!
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250625131920eucas1p271b196cde042bd39ac08fb12beff5baf@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-06-25 13:18 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] dma-debug: refactor to use physical addresses for page mapping Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] dma-mapping: rename trace_dma_*map_page to trace_dma_*map_phys Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/dma: rename iommu_dma_*map_page to iommu_dma_*map_phys Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/8] dma-mapping: convert dma_direct_*map_page to be phys_addr_t based Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/8] kmsan: convert kmsan_handle_dma to use physical addresses Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-26 17:43 ` Alexander Potapenko
2025-06-26 18:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-27 16:28 ` Alexander Potapenko
2025-06-25 13:19 ` [PATCH 6/8] dma-mapping: fail early if physical address is mapped through platform callback Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-25 20:04 ` Robin Murphy
2025-07-27 6:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19 ` [PATCH 7/8] dma-mapping: export new dma_*map_phys() interface Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/hmm: migrate to physical address-based DMA mapping API Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-15 13:24 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-15 13:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-27 13:44 ` [PATCH 0/8] dma-mapping: migrate to physical address-based API Marek Szyprowski
2025-06-27 17:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-30 13:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 10:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-08 11:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-08 11:45 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-08 12:06 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-08 12:56 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-08 15:57 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-30 11:11 ` Robin Murphy
2025-07-30 13:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-30 14:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-31 6:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-30 16:32 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-31 17:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-03 15:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-04 3:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-05 15:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-06 6:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-25 20:05 ` Robin Murphy
2025-07-29 14:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250805153606.GR26511@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox