linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] dma-mapping: migrate to physical address-based API
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 12:36:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250805153606.GR26511@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJArFNkuP8DJIdMY@casper.infradead.org>

On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 04:37:56AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 12:59:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Matthew, do you think it makes sense to introduce types to make this
> > clearer? We have two kinds of values that a phys_addr_t can store -
> > something compatible with kmap_XX_phys(), and something that isn't.
> 
> I was with you up until this point.  And then you said "What if we have
> a raccoon that isn't a raccoon" and my brain derailed.

I though it was clear..

   kmap_local_pfn(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT)
   phys_to_virt(phys)

Does not work for all values of phys. It definately illegal for
non-cachable MMIO. Agree?

There is a subset of phys that is cachable and has struct page that is
usable with kmap_local_pfn()/etc

phys is always this:

> - CPU untranslated.  This is the "physical" address.  Physical address
>   0 is what the CPU sees when it drives zeroes on the memory bus.

But that is a pure HW perspective. It doesn't say which of our SW APIs
are allowed to use this address.

We have callchains in DMA API land that want to do a kmap at the
bottom. It would be nice to mark the whole call chain that the
phys_addr being passed around is actually required to be kmappable.

Because if you pass a non-kmappable MMIO backed phys it will explode
in some way on some platforms.

> > We clearly have these two different ideas floating around in code,
> > page tables, etc.

> No.  No, we don't.  I've never heard of this asininity before.

Welcome to the fun world of cachable and non-cachable memory.

Consider, today we can create struct pages of type
MEMORY_DEVICE_PCI_P2PDMA for non-cachable MMIO. I think today you
"can" use kmap to establish a cachable mapping in the vmap.

But it is *illegal* to establish a cachable CPU mapping of MMIO. Archs
are free to MCE if you do this - speculative cache line load of MMIO
can just error in HW inside the interconnect.

So, the phys_addr is always a "CPU untranslated physical address" but
the cachable/non-cachable cases, or DRAM vs MMIO, are sometimes
semantically very different things for the SW!

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-05 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250625131920eucas1p271b196cde042bd39ac08fb12beff5baf@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-06-25 13:18 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:18   ` [PATCH 1/8] dma-debug: refactor to use physical addresses for page mapping Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:18   ` [PATCH 2/8] dma-mapping: rename trace_dma_*map_page to trace_dma_*map_phys Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19   ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/dma: rename iommu_dma_*map_page to iommu_dma_*map_phys Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19   ` [PATCH 4/8] dma-mapping: convert dma_direct_*map_page to be phys_addr_t based Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19   ` [PATCH 5/8] kmsan: convert kmsan_handle_dma to use physical addresses Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-26 17:43     ` Alexander Potapenko
2025-06-26 18:45       ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-27 16:28         ` Alexander Potapenko
2025-06-25 13:19   ` [PATCH 6/8] dma-mapping: fail early if physical address is mapped through platform callback Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-25 20:04     ` Robin Murphy
2025-07-27  6:30       ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19   ` [PATCH 7/8] dma-mapping: export new dma_*map_phys() interface Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-25 13:19   ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/hmm: migrate to physical address-based DMA mapping API Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-15 13:24     ` Will Deacon
2025-07-15 13:58       ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-27 13:44   ` [PATCH 0/8] dma-mapping: migrate to physical address-based API Marek Szyprowski
2025-06-27 17:02     ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-30 13:38       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 10:27         ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-08 11:00           ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-08 11:45             ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-08 12:06               ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-08 12:56                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-08 15:57                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-30 11:11           ` Robin Murphy
2025-07-30 13:40             ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-30 14:28               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-31  6:01                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-30 16:32             ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-07-31 17:37             ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-03 15:59               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-04  3:37                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-05 15:36                   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-06  6:00       ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-07-25 20:05   ` Robin Murphy
2025-07-29 14:03     ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250805153606.GR26511@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox