From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, glider@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
dvyukov@google.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kasan: disable kasan_strings() kunit test when CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 11:38:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250801113228-5a2487e0-0d90-4828-88c7-be2e3c23ad3b@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801092805.2602490-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 10:28:05AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> When CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE is enabled, invalid access from source
> triggers __fortify_panic() which kills running task.
>
> This makes failured of kasan_strings() kunit testcase since the
> kunit-try-cacth kthread running kasan_string() dies before checking the
> fault.
"makes failured" sounds wrong. Maybe this?
"This interferes with kasan_strings(), as CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE will trigger
and kill the test before KASAN can react."
> To address this, add define for __NO_FORTIFY for kasan kunit test.
"To address this" is superfluous. Maybe this?
"Disable CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE through __NO_FORTIFY for the kasan kunit test to
remove the interference."
>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
Missing link and changelog to v1.
> mm/kasan/Makefile | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/Makefile b/mm/kasan/Makefile
> index dd93ae8a6beb..b70d76c167ca 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/Makefile
> +++ b/mm/kasan/Makefile
> @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ ifndef CONFIG_CC_HAS_KASAN_MEMINTRINSIC_PREFIX
> CFLAGS_KASAN_TEST += -fno-builtin
> endif
>
> +ifdef CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE
> +CFLAGS_KASAN_TEST += -D__NO_FORTIFY
> +endif
The ifdef is unnecessary. If CONFIG_FORITY_SOURCE is not enabled, the define
will be a no-op. This also matches other uses of __NO_FORTIFY.
> +
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_kasan_test_c.o += $(call cc-option, -Wvla-larger-than=1)
> CFLAGS_kasan_test_c.o := $(CFLAGS_KASAN_TEST)
> RUSTFLAGS_kasan_test_rust.o := $(RUSTFLAGS_KASAN)
> --
> LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-01 9:28 Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-01 9:38 ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2025-08-01 9:47 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-01 10:30 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-08-01 11:59 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250801113228-5a2487e0-0d90-4828-88c7-be2e3c23ad3b@linutronix.de \
--to=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox