From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, stable@kenrel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/kmemleak: avoid deadlock by moving pr_warn() outside kmemleak_lock
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 02:57:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250731-kmemleak_lock-v1-1-728fd470198f@debian.org> (raw)
When netpoll is enabled, calling pr_warn_once() while holding
kmemleak_lock in mem_pool_alloc() can cause a deadlock due to lock
inversion with the netconsole subsystem. This occurs because
pr_warn_once() may trigger netpoll, which eventually leads to
__alloc_skb() and back into kmemleak code, attempting to reacquire
kmemleak_lock.
This is the path for the deadlock.
mem_pool_alloc()
-> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kmemleak_lock, flags);
-> pr_warn_once()
-> netconsole subsystem
-> netpoll
-> __alloc_skb
-> __create_object
-> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kmemleak_lock, flags);
Fix this by setting a flag and issuing the pr_warn_once() after
kmemleak_lock is released.
Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Fixes: c5665868183fec ("mm: kmemleak: use the memory pool for early allocations")
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
mm/kmemleak.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 8d588e6853110..e0333455c7384 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *mem_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct kmemleak_object *object;
+ bool warn = false;
/* try the slab allocator first */
if (object_cache) {
@@ -488,8 +489,10 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *mem_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
else if (mem_pool_free_count)
object = &mem_pool[--mem_pool_free_count];
else
- pr_warn_once("Memory pool empty, consider increasing CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_MEM_POOL_SIZE\n");
+ warn = true;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kmemleak_lock, flags);
+ if (warn)
+ pr_warn_once("Memory pool empty, consider increasing CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_MEM_POOL_SIZE\n");
return object;
}
---
base-commit: 260f6f4fda93c8485c8037865c941b42b9cba5d2
change-id: 20250731-kmemleak_lock-4e04743ea79e
Best regards,
--
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-31 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-31 9:57 Breno Leitao [this message]
2025-08-04 10:25 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250731-kmemleak_lock-v1-1-728fd470198f@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kenrel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox