From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] iomap: remove pos+len BUG_ON() to after folio lookup
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 22:14:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715051435.GM2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714204122.349582-3-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 04:41:17PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The bug checks at the top of iomap_write_begin() assume the pos/len
> reflect exactly the next range to process. This may no longer be the
> case once the get folio path is able to process a folio batch from
> the filesystem. On top of that, len is already trimmed to within the
> iomap/srcmap by iomap_length(), so these checks aren't terribly
> useful. Remove the unnecessary BUG_ON() checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Heh, glad this went away
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 3729391a18f3..38da2fa6e6b0 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -805,15 +805,12 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct folio **foliop,
> {
> const struct iomap_folio_ops *folio_ops = iter->iomap.folio_ops;
> const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
> - loff_t pos = iter->pos;
> + loff_t pos;
> u64 len = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, iomap_length(iter));
> struct folio *folio;
> int status = 0;
>
> len = min_not_zero(len, *plen);
> - BUG_ON(pos + len > iter->iomap.offset + iter->iomap.length);
> - if (srcmap != &iter->iomap)
> - BUG_ON(pos + len > srcmap->offset + srcmap->length);
>
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> return -EINTR;
> --
> 2.50.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 20:41 [PATCH v3 0/7] iomap: zero range folio batch support Brian Foster
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] filemap: add helper to look up dirty folios in a range Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] iomap: remove pos+len BUG_ON() to after folio lookup Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:14 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:35 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-18 11:30 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-18 13:48 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-19 11:07 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-21 8:47 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-28 12:57 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-30 13:19 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-02 7:26 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-30 13:17 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-02 7:19 ` Zhang Yi
2025-08-05 13:08 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-06 3:10 ` Zhang Yi
2025-08-06 13:25 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-07 4:58 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] xfs: always trim mapping to requested range for zero range Brian Foster
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:35 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] iomap: remove old partial eof zeroing optimization Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 16:20 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 16:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] xfs: error tag to force zeroing on debug kernels Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:39 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 16:20 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250715051435.GM2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox