linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Kirill Shutemov <k.shutemov@gmail.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] __folio_split() clean up.
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:23:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250711182355.3592618-1-ziy@nvidia.com> (raw)

Based on the prior discussion[1], this patch improves
__split_unmapped_folio() by making it reusable for splitting unmapped folios.
This helps avoid the need for a new boolean unmapped parameter to guard
mapping-related code.

An additional benefit is that __split_unmapped_folio() could be
called on after-split folios by __folio_split(). It can enable new split
methods. For example, at deferred split time, unmapped subpages can
scatter arbitrarily within a large folio, neither uniform nor non-uniform
split can maximize after-split folio orders for mapped subpages.
The hope is that by calling __split_unmapped_folio() multiple times,
a better split result can be achieved.

It passed mm selftests.


Changelog
===
From V1[2]:
1. Fixed indentations.
2. Used folio_expected_ref_count() to calculate ref_count instead of
   open coding.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/94D8C1A4-780C-4BEC-A336-7D3613B54845@nvidia.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250711030259.3574392-1-ziy@nvidia.com/

Zi Yan (2):
  mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio()
  mm/huge_memory: use folio_expected_ref_count() to calculate ref_count.

 mm/huge_memory.c | 271 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.2



             reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 18:23 Zi Yan [this message]
2025-07-11 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/huge_memory: move unrelated code out of __split_unmapped_folio() Zi Yan
2025-07-14  1:15   ` Balbir Singh
2025-07-14 15:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-14 15:33     ` Zi Yan
2025-07-11 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/huge_memory: use folio_expected_ref_count() to calculate ref_count Zi Yan
2025-07-14  0:43   ` Balbir Singh
2025-07-14 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250711182355.3592618-1-ziy@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=k.shutemov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox