From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Disable hugetlb page table sharing on 32-bit
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 10:32:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702-x86-2level-hugetlb-v2-1-1a98096edf92@google.com> (raw)
Only select ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE on 64-bit x86.
Page table sharing requires at least three levels because it involves
shared references to PMD tables; 32-bit x86 has either two-level paging
(without PAE) or three-level paging (with PAE), but even with
three-level paging, having a dedicated PGD entry for hugetlb is only
barely possible (because the PGD only has four entries), and it seems
unlikely anyone's actually using PMD sharing on 32-bit.
Having ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE enabled on non-PAE 32-bit X86 (which
has 2-level paging) became particularly problematic after commit
59d9094df3d7 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count"),
since that changes `struct ptdesc` such that the `pt_mm` (for PGDs) and
the `pt_share_count` (for PMDs) share the same union storage - and with
2-level paging, PMDs are PGDs.
(For comparison, arm64 also gates ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE on the
configuration of page tables such that it is never enabled with 2-level
paging.)
Reported-by: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/srhpjxlqfna67blvma5frmy3aa@altlinux.org
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Tested-by: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
Fixes: cfe28c5d63d8 ("x86: mm: Remove x86 version of huge_pmd_share.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
---
I'm carrying over Vitaly Chikunov's "Tested-by" from v1.
Changes in v2:
- disable it for 32-bit entirely (Dave Hansen)
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630-x86-2level-hugetlb-v1-1-077cd53d8255@google.com
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 71019b3b54ea..4e0fe688cc83 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ config X86
select ARCH_WANTS_DYNAMIC_TASK_STRUCT
select ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
select ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB
- select ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
+ select ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE if X86_64
select ARCH_WANT_LD_ORPHAN_WARN
select ARCH_WANT_OPTIMIZE_DAX_VMEMMAP if X86_64
select ARCH_WANT_OPTIMIZE_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP if X86_64
---
base-commit: d0b3b7b22dfa1f4b515fd3a295b3fd958f9e81af
change-id: 20250630-x86-2level-hugetlb-b1d8feb255ce
--
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 8:32 Jann Horn [this message]
2025-07-02 8:50 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-07-04 14:20 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702-x86-2level-hugetlb-v2-1-1a98096edf92@google.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vt@altlinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox