From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C9BC77B7C for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0B6446B00BE; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 06E316B00C0; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:15:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DFCE06B00C4; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:15:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08E96B00BE for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:15:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2124ABB3F6 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:15:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83595180270.16.CBB7A15 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by imf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C4840012 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf11.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=PaikpPjc; spf=pass (imf11.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1750886153; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=rBA4fyvA9IsWaP170nXvXNXZUdfs/C4vvIOoCtgZedM=; b=Cs5rcDuQBYYGy+X3B15qd/IPXThII1cavzQNFFwBfDetfgPxA7kaA4gN1Fzpo1VIGYei30 50HouAVDFZdgg6ka5MDFpHAmSDB/Em5AHoOLpgUF/nMm8qHPedZ8NspltK4isOreVWxIum 93vWMCcTQu7lW5SJkIbHFhTGHFOH1Ss= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1750886153; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=m0XxASWWWQYkpQFv7ggudE8DQd3ieOc7vT5yKDzIsshdNZsa6OdmrvDu7JEXaFJ8XQUzDr +3v/X1fIkyu78O57o623b/WifgRAATLmURQQtoUO/FQvB2QDuNkyq1o13d+oaN+4vam8Ce JSKvshlix7ynHQVLGBAeED5g1a/lOtk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf11.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=PaikpPjc; spf=pass (imf11.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FCC61425; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2196AC4CEEA; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 21:15:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1750886152; bh=tLD1fgkMwIEuaveK57lBAd2AzhKGL8baxviM3xdt1eY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PaikpPjciEQ1W0WlgHRzbTUF9K64d0INQvR8RUdhqjy3ZwYVrOmW2Cwk+tSW/wZi9 KJrBD4aRKe6VdDCm91Dn5Cx8yGRKQDuAIo8fi0Y2mcnPkE52ZT7VhkwgqNkkOyP1RP FMDNwxeWmXQyh4RHtNzn43TuS+XOhtUiF1q4a+Mg= Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:15:51 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Berg Cc: David Hildenbrand , Zi Yan , Matthew Brost , Joshua Hahn , Rakie Kim , Byungchul Park , Gregory Price , Ying Huang , Alistair Popple , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - MEMORY POLICY AND MIGRATION" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix do_pages_stat to use compat_uptr_t Message-Id: <20250625141551.ca068f6bc901943559df6bdf@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250625133909.1a054c24d933cd97afd0027d@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 79C4840012 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Stat-Signature: yyokp5sz31tc86fjuck9uo31a1i6a3md X-HE-Tag: 1750886153-825057 X-HE-Meta: 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 PFC4C+mP zmZqMTP+Pqq1TwO6fKilqEhOjGWZdox6uUCmqqVtuJj5a1GymQYODRy8iczVkDbXIRUP7RNBWAtu6qgSAoUIKXUAn8ohASMAy7da3HOmlaU3tHVp9AtcslFaRMzxF224bPYSBjIJbSHuulMBeh8V0YUpOzGlEFYW+PxezfOOnBOu4guIeFwagI8D8d7QeKY6XvQa+uXrLnBwGRmY8W39Z4nNIoacFdlZIQgbI3OfUOmC8oOxPFWdhrsrOXI+w+l5/JV3H6LCFY2R/suLJA3tsQl5sYQXZz294KqH76Fa4XYggc+9Osr9qO2zEkGtCdRpxb5vTfaCM0FI38IBbtvES5y+y9NYy8eqeIM6a7us8WMZba8EpMKOpGAXFZZ2cNvqSOWgGAau7Ps552/8= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 23:10:13 +0200 Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Andrew Morton > > I'll update the Subject: as David suggests and I'll add a cc:stable, > > thanks. I'll also add a note that David suggested an alternative, so > > please let's advance that option. > > Sorry, I'm new here. Do I have to do anything now? The above sounds > like the alternative coding by David would be preferred, but the other > mails say the patches have already been pushed to a hotfix branch? Or > are we doing both, i.e. stable gets the simple fix and next the pretty > one? Well I added the v1 patch for testing and so it doesn't get lost - fixing the bug is the most important thing. But if a nicer v2 patch is sent in the next few days, I can switch to that version.