linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Andre Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] uaccess: Add masked_user_{read/write}_access_begin
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 17:35:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250622173554.7f016f96@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fddae0cf0da15a6521bb847b63324b7a2a067b1.1750585239.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 11:52:39 +0200
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:

> Allthough masked_user_access_begin() seems to only be used when reading
> data from user at the moment, introduce masked_user_read_access_begin()
> and masked_user_write_access_begin() in order to match
> user_read_access_begin() and user_write_access_begin().
> 
> Have them default to masked_user_access_begin() when they are
> not defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  fs/select.c             | 2 +-
>  include/linux/uaccess.h | 8 ++++++++
>  kernel/futex/futex.h    | 4 ++--
>  lib/strncpy_from_user.c | 2 +-
>  lib/strnlen_user.c      | 2 +-
>  5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
> index 9fb650d03d52..d8547bedf5eb 100644
> --- a/fs/select.c
> +++ b/fs/select.c
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static inline int get_sigset_argpack(struct sigset_argpack *to,
>  	// the path is hot enough for overhead of copy_from_user() to matter
>  	if (from) {
>  		if (can_do_masked_user_access())
> -			from = masked_user_access_begin(from);
> +			from = masked_user_read_access_begin(from);
>  		else if (!user_read_access_begin(from, sizeof(*from)))
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  		unsafe_get_user(to->p, &from->p, Efault);
> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> index 7c06f4795670..682a0cd2fe51 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@

>  #ifdef masked_user_access_begin
>   #define can_do_masked_user_access() 1
>  #else
>   #define can_do_masked_user_access() 0
>   #define masked_user_access_begin(src) NULL
>   #define mask_user_address(src) (src)
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef masked_user_write_access_begin
> +#define masked_user_write_access_begin masked_user_access_begin
> +#endif
> +#ifndef masked_user_read_access_begin
> +#define masked_user_read_access_begin masked_user_access_begin
> +#endif

I think that needs merging with the bit above.
Perhaps generating something like:

#ifdef masked_user_access_begin
#define masked_user_read_access_begin masked_user_access_begin
#define masked_user_write_access_begin masked_user_access_begin
#endif

#ifdef masked_user_read_access_begin
  #define can_do_masked_user_access() 1
#else
  #define can_do_masked_user_access() 0
  #define masked_user_read_access_begin(src) NULL
  #define masked_user_write_access_begin(src) NULL
  #define mask_user_address(src) (src)
#endif

Otherwise you'll have to #define masked_user_access_begin even though
it is never used.

Two more patches could change x86-64 to define both and then remove
the 'then unused' first check - but that has to be for later.

	David




  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-22 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-22  9:52 [PATCH 0/5] powerpc: Implement masked user access Christophe Leroy
2025-06-22  9:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] uaccess: Add masked_user_{read/write}_access_begin Christophe Leroy
2025-06-22 16:35   ` David Laight [this message]
2025-06-24  5:34     ` Christophe Leroy
2025-06-22  9:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user_iter() Christophe Leroy
2025-06-22 16:52   ` David Laight
2025-06-22 16:57   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-22 20:18     ` David Laight
2025-06-24  5:49     ` Christophe Leroy
2025-06-24  8:07       ` David Laight
2025-06-24 15:15       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-22  9:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc: Remove unused size parametre to KUAP enabling/disabling functions Christophe Leroy
2025-06-22  9:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: Move barrier_nospec() out of allow_read_{from/write}_user() Christophe Leroy
2025-06-22  9:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc: Implement masked user access Christophe Leroy
2025-06-22 17:13   ` David Laight
2025-06-22 17:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-22 19:51       ` David Laight
2025-06-22 18:57     ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-06-22 16:20 ` [PATCH 0/5] " David Laight
2025-06-24  5:27   ` Christophe Leroy
2025-06-24  8:32     ` David Laight
2025-06-24 21:37       ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-06-25  8:30         ` David Laight
2025-06-24 13:17     ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-06-24 16:50       ` David Laight
2025-06-24 18:25         ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-06-24 21:08           ` David Laight
2025-06-26  5:56             ` Christophe Leroy
2025-06-26 22:01               ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-07-05 10:55                 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-07-05 11:42                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-07-05 18:33                 ` David Laight
2025-07-05 20:15                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-07-05 21:05                     ` David Laight
2025-07-05 21:37                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2025-06-26 21:39             ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250622173554.7f016f96@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox