From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel_team@skhynix.com,
Yunjeong Mun <yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] samples/damon: change enable parameters to enabled
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 09:14:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250622161422.50852-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250622120926.1712-3-honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Hi Honggyu,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 21:09:24 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com> wrote:
> The damon_{lru_sort,reclaim,stat} kernel modules use "enabled"
> parameter knobs as follows.
>
> /sys/module/damon_lru_sort/parameters/enabled
> /sys/module/damon_reclaim/parameters/enabled
> /sys/module/damon_stat/parameters/enabled
>
> However, other sample modules of damon use "enable" parameter knobs so
> it'd be better to rename them from "enable" to "enabled" to keep the
> consistency with other damon modules.
I think this is a good change, thank you!
[...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
> Cc: Yunjeong Mun <yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
I have simple comments about variable names below. If you address it, please
feel free to add below.
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> ---
> samples/damon/mtier.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> samples/damon/prcl.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> samples/damon/wsse.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/damon/mtier.c b/samples/damon/mtier.c
> index f3220d6e6739..cb273bf4b5c2 100644
> --- a/samples/damon/mtier.c
> +++ b/samples/damon/mtier.c
> @@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ module_param(node0_mem_free_bp, ulong, 0600);
> static int damon_sample_mtier_enable_store(
> const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp);
>
> -static const struct kernel_param_ops enable_param_ops = {
> +static const struct kernel_param_ops enabled_param_ops = {
> .set = damon_sample_mtier_enable_store,
> .get = param_get_bool,
> };
>
> -static bool enable __read_mostly;
> -module_param_cb(enable, &enable_param_ops, &enable, 0600);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable of disable DAMON_SAMPLE_MTIER");
> +static bool enabled __read_mostly;
> +module_param_cb(enabled, &enabled_param_ops, &enabled, 0600);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(enabled, "Enable or disable DAMON_SAMPLE_MTIER");
>
> static struct damon_ctx *ctxs[2];
>
> @@ -160,17 +160,17 @@ static void damon_sample_mtier_stop(void)
> static int damon_sample_mtier_enable_store(
> const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> - bool enabled = enable;
> + bool enable = enabled;
The local variable is to cache the old state of the parameter. Hence I think
'enable' is not a very good name here. I'd prefer naming the local variable
and similar ones on other sample modules as 'is_enabled' or somewhat else that
better represents its usage.
[...]
> diff --git a/samples/damon/prcl.c b/samples/damon/prcl.c
[...]
> @@ -112,17 +112,17 @@ static void damon_sample_prcl_stop(void)
> static int damon_sample_prcl_enable_store(
> const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> - bool enabled = enable;
> + bool enable = enabled;
Ditto.
[...]
> diff --git a/samples/damon/wsse.c b/samples/damon/wsse.c
[...]
> @@ -92,17 +92,17 @@ static void damon_sample_wsse_stop(void)
> static int damon_sample_wsse_enable_store(
> const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> - bool enabled = enable;
> + bool enable = enabled;
Here, too.
[...]
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-22 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-22 12:09 [PATCH 0/3] mm/damon: Enhance damon and its samples Honggyu Kim
2025-06-22 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/damon: do not allow creating zero size region Honggyu Kim
2025-06-22 16:04 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 2:58 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-06-23 18:03 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-25 22:24 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-06-26 15:27 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-27 11:29 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-06-22 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] samples/damon: change enable parameters to enabled Honggyu Kim
2025-06-22 16:14 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-06-23 3:04 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-06-22 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] samples/damon: fix bugs for damon sample for start failures Honggyu Kim
2025-06-22 16:29 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-23 3:16 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-06-23 18:11 ` SeongJae Park
2025-06-25 22:27 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-06-26 15:28 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250622161422.50852-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox