linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lizhe.67@bytedance.com
To: jgg@ziepe.ca
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	david@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	lizhe.67@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] gup: introduce unpin_user_folio_dirty_locked()
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 20:49:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250619124906.47505-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619123504.GA1643390@ziepe.ca>

On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:35:04 -0300, jgg@ziepe.ca wrote:
 
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 05:05:42PM +0800, lizhe.67@bytedance.com wrote:
> 
> > As I understand it, there seem to be some issues with this
> > implementation. How can we obtain the value of dma->has_reserved
> > (acquiring it within vfio_pin_pages_remote() might be a good option)
> 
> Yes, you record it during vfio_pin_pages operations. If VFIO call
> iommu_map on something that went down the non-GUP path then it sets
> the flag.
> 
> > and ensure that this value remains unchanged from the time of
> > assignment until we perform the unpin operation? 
> 
> Map/unmap are paired and not allowed to race so that isn't an issue.
> 
> > I've searched through the code and it appears that there are
> > instances where SetPageReserved() is called outside of the
> > initialization phase.  Please correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> It should not be relevant here, pages under use by VFIO are not
> permitted to change it will break things.

Then this approach appears to be no problem, and there’s no need to
introduce any new interfaces. All modifications remain internal to
vfio. I’ll send out a v5 patch based on this approach.

Thanks,
Zhe


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-19 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17  4:18 [PATCH v4 0/3] optimize vfio_unpin_pages_remote() for large folio lizhe.67
2025-06-17  4:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] vfio/type1: batch vfio_find_vpfn() in function vfio_unpin_pages_remote() lizhe.67
2025-06-17  4:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] gup: introduce unpin_user_folio_dirty_locked() lizhe.67
2025-06-17  7:35   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 13:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-17 13:45     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 13:58       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 14:04         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 15:22           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-18  6:28             ` lizhe.67
2025-06-18  8:20               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18 11:36               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-18 11:40                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18 11:42                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18 11:46                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-18 11:52                       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18 11:56                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-18 12:19                           ` lizhe.67
2025-06-18 13:23                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-19  9:05                               ` lizhe.67
2025-06-19 12:35                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-19 12:49                                   ` lizhe.67 [this message]
2025-06-17  4:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] vfio/type1: optimize vfio_unpin_pages_remote() for large folio lizhe.67
2025-06-17  7:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17  9:21     ` [PATCH v4 2/3] gup: introduce unpin_user_folio_dirty_locked() lizhe.67
2025-06-17  9:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17  9:47         ` [PATCH v4 3/3] vfio/type1: optimize vfio_unpin_pages_remote() for large folio lizhe.67
2025-06-17  9:49           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 12:42             ` lizhe.67
2025-06-17 13:47               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18  6:11                 ` lizhe.67
2025-06-18  7:22                   ` lizhe.67
2025-06-18  8:54                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-18  9:39                     ` lizhe.67

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250619124906.47505-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
    --to=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox