linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] mm,hugetlb: Document the reason to lock the folio in the faulting path
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:46:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250612134701.377855-3-osalvador@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250612134701.377855-1-osalvador@suse.de>

Recent conversations showed that there was a misunderstanding about why we
were locking the folio prior to calling hugetlb_wp().
Document explicitly why we need to take the lock, explaining on the way that
although the timespan for the locking of anonymous and file folios is different,
it would require a major surgery to represent that difference with the current
code.

Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 175edafeec67..dfa09fc3b2c6 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6537,6 +6537,10 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct address_space *mapping,
 			}
 			new_pagecache_folio = true;
 		} else {
+			/*
+			 * hugetlb_wp() expects the folio to be locked in order to
+			 * check whether we can re-use this page exclusively for us.
+			 */
 			folio_lock(folio);
 			anon_rmap = 1;
 		}
@@ -6801,7 +6805,19 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		/* Fallthrough to CoW */
 	}
 
-	/* hugetlb_wp() requires page locks of pte_page(vmf.orig_pte) */
+	/*
+	 * We need to lock the folio before calling hugetlb_wp().
+	 * Either the folio is in the pagecache and we need to copy it over
+	 * to another file, so it must remain stable throughout the operation,
+	 * or the folio is anonymous and we need to lock it in order to check
+	 * whether we can re-use it and mark it exclusive for this process.
+	 * The timespan for the lock differs depending on the type, since
+	 * anonymous folios only need to hold the lock while checking whether we
+	 * can re-use it, while we need to hold it throughout the copy in case
+	 * we are dealing with a folio from a pagecache.
+	 * Representing this difference would be tricky with the current code,
+	 * so just hold the lock for the duration of hugetlb_wp().
+	 */
 	folio = page_folio(pte_page(vmf.orig_pte));
 	folio_lock(folio);
 	folio_get(folio);
-- 
2.49.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-12 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-12 13:46 [PATCH 0/5] Misc rework on hugetlb_fault Oscar Salvador
2025-06-12 13:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm,hugetlb: Change mechanism to detect a COW on private mapping Oscar Salvador
2025-06-13 13:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-12 13:46 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2025-06-13 13:56   ` [PATCH 2/5] mm,hugetlb: Document the reason to lock the folio in the faulting path David Hildenbrand
2025-06-13 14:23     ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-13 19:57       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-13 21:47         ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-14  9:07           ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-16  9:22             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-16 14:10               ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-16 14:41                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 10:03                   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-17 11:27                     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 12:04                       ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-17 12:08                         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 12:10                           ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-17 12:50                             ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-17 13:42                               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 14:00                                 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-19 11:52                                 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-12 13:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm,hugetlb: Conver anon_rmap into boolean Oscar Salvador
2025-06-13 13:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-12 13:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm,hugetlb: Drop obsolete comment about non-present pte and second faults Oscar Salvador
2025-06-12 13:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm,hugetlb: Drop unlikelys from hugetlb_fault Oscar Salvador
2025-06-13  8:55 ` [PATCH 0/5] Misc rework on hugetlb_fault Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250612134701.377855-3-osalvador@suse.de \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox