linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] selftests/mm: Add messages about test errors to the cow tests
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:13:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610-selftest-mm-cow-tweaks-v1-4-43cd7457500f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610-selftest-mm-cow-tweaks-v1-0-43cd7457500f@kernel.org>

It is not sufficiently clear what the individual tests in the cow test
program are checking so add messages for the failure cases.

Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
index 48fcf03aa4cd..29767e2afdd0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
@@ -268,8 +268,10 @@ static void do_test_cow_in_parent(char *mem, size_t size, bool do_mprotect,
 		 * fail because (a) harder to fix and (b) nobody really cares.
 		 * Flag them as expected failure for now.
 		 */
+		ksft_print_msg("Leak from parent into child\n");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_XFAIL);
 	} else {
+		ksft_print_msg("Leak from parent into child\n");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL);
 	}
 close_comm_pipes:
@@ -397,8 +399,10 @@ static void do_test_vmsplice_in_parent(char *mem, size_t size,
 		 * fail because (a) harder to fix and (b) nobody really cares.
 		 * Flag them as expected failure for now.
 		 */
+		ksft_print_msg("Leak from child into parent\n");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_XFAIL);
 	} else {
+		ksft_print_msg("Leak from child into parent\n");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL);
 	}
 close_pipe:
@@ -570,10 +574,12 @@ static void do_test_iouring(char *mem, size_t size, bool use_fork)
 	}
 
 	/* Finally, check if we read what we expected. */
-	if (!memcmp(mem, tmp, size))
+	if (!memcmp(mem, tmp, size)) {
 		log_test_result(KSFT_PASS);
-	else
+	} else {
+		ksft_print_msg("Longtom R/W pin is not reliable\n");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL);
+	}
 
 quit_child:
 	if (use_fork) {
@@ -725,10 +731,12 @@ static void do_test_ro_pin(char *mem, size_t size, enum ro_pin_test test,
 		ksft_perror("PIN_LONGTERM_TEST_READ failed");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL);
 	} else {
-		if (!memcmp(mem, tmp, size))
+		if (!memcmp(mem, tmp, size)) {
 			log_test_result(KSFT_PASS);
-		else
+		} else {
+			ksft_print_msg("Longterm R/O pin is not reliable\n");
 			log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL);
+		}
 	}
 
 	ret = ioctl(gup_fd, PIN_LONGTERM_TEST_STOP);
@@ -1417,10 +1425,12 @@ static void do_test_anon_thp_collapse(char *mem, size_t size,
 	else
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!ret)
+	if (!ret) {
 		log_test_result(KSFT_PASS);
-	else
+	} else {
+		ksft_print_msg("Leak from parent into child\n");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL);
+	}
 close_comm_pipes:
 	close_comm_pipes(&comm_pipes);
 }
@@ -1528,10 +1538,12 @@ static void test_cow(char *mem, const char *smem, size_t size)
 	memset(mem, 0xff, size);
 
 	/* See if we still read the old values via the other mapping. */
-	if (!memcmp(smem, old, size))
+	if (!memcmp(smem, old, size)) {
 		log_test_result(KSFT_PASS);
-	else
+	} else {
+		ksft_print_msg("Other mapping modified\n");
 		log_test_result(KSFT_FAIL);
+	}
 	free(old);
 }
 

-- 
2.39.5



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10 14:13 [PATCH 0/4] selftests/mm: Tweaks to the cow test Mark Brown
2025-06-10 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] kselftest/mm: Clarify errors for pipe() Mark Brown
2025-06-11 12:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-10 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/mm: Convert some cow error reports to ksft_perror() Mark Brown
2025-06-11 12:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-11 12:14     ` Mark Brown
2025-06-10 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/mm: Don't compare return values to in cow Mark Brown
2025-06-11 12:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-10 14:13 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2025-06-11 12:11   ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/mm: Add messages about test errors to the cow tests David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610-selftest-mm-cow-tweaks-v1-4-43cd7457500f@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox