From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:12:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609161219.GE6156@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605173357.579720-6-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:33:55PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Use the iomap folio batch mechanism to select folios to zero on zero
> range of unwritten mappings. Trim the resulting mapping if the batch
> is filled (unlikely for current use cases) to distinguish between a
> range to skip and one that requires another iteration due to a full
> batch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index b5cf5bc6308d..63054f7ead0e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1691,6 +1691,8 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> struct iomap *iomap,
> struct iomap *srcmap)
> {
> + struct iomap_iter *iter = container_of(iomap, struct iomap_iter,
> + iomap);
/me has been wondering more and more if we should just pass the iter
directly to iomap_begin rather than make them play these container_of
tricks... OTOH I think the whole point of this:
ret = ops->iomap_begin(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len, iter->flags,
&iter->iomap, &iter->srcmap);
is to "avoid" allowing the iomap users to mess with the internals of the
iomap iter...
> struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> xfs_fileoff_t offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
> @@ -1762,6 +1764,7 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> */
> if (flags & IOMAP_ZERO) {
> xfs_fileoff_t eof_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, XFS_ISIZE(ip));
> + u64 end;
>
> if (isnullstartblock(imap.br_startblock) &&
> offset_fsb >= eof_fsb)
> @@ -1769,6 +1772,26 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> if (offset_fsb < eof_fsb && end_fsb > eof_fsb)
> end_fsb = eof_fsb;
>
> + /*
> + * Look up dirty folios for unwritten mappings within EOF.
> + * Providing this bypasses the flush iomap uses to trigger
> + * extent conversion when unwritten mappings have dirty
> + * pagecache in need of zeroing.
> + *
> + * Trim the mapping to the end pos of the lookup, which in turn
> + * was trimmed to the end of the batch if it became full before
> + * the end of the mapping.
> + */
> + if (imap.br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN &&
> + offset_fsb < eof_fsb) {
> + loff_t len = min(count,
> + XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, imap.br_blockcount));
> +
> + end = iomap_fill_dirty_folios(iter, offset, len);
...though I wonder, does this need to happen in
xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin? Is it required to hold the ILOCK while
we go look for folios in the mapping? Or could this become a part of
iomap_write_begin?
--D
> + end_fsb = min_t(xfs_fileoff_t, end_fsb,
> + XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, end));
> + }
> +
> xfs_trim_extent(&imap, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb);
> }
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 17:33 [PATCH 0/7] iomap: zero range folio batch support Brian Foster
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] iomap: move pos+len BUG_ON() to after folio lookup Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10 4:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:16 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] filemap: add helper to look up dirty folios in a range Brian Foster
2025-06-09 15:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10 4:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:17 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 4:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:21 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 12:21 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 14:19 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-11 3:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-11 3:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12 4:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: always trim mapping to requested range for zero range Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings Brian Foster
2025-06-06 2:02 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-06 15:20 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:12 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-06-10 4:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:24 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-02 18:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] iomap: remove old partial eof zeroing optimization Brian Foster
2025-06-10 4:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] xfs: error tag to force zeroing on debug kernels Brian Foster
2025-06-10 4:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:26 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 14:20 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 19:12 ` Brian Foster
2025-06-11 3:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250609161219.GE6156@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox