linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:12:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609161219.GE6156@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605173357.579720-6-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:33:55PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Use the iomap folio batch mechanism to select folios to zero on zero
> range of unwritten mappings. Trim the resulting mapping if the batch
> is filled (unlikely for current use cases) to distinguish between a
> range to skip and one that requires another iteration due to a full
> batch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index b5cf5bc6308d..63054f7ead0e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1691,6 +1691,8 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  	struct iomap		*iomap,
>  	struct iomap		*srcmap)
>  {
> +	struct iomap_iter	*iter = container_of(iomap, struct iomap_iter,
> +						     iomap);

/me has been wondering more and more if we should just pass the iter
directly to iomap_begin rather than make them play these container_of
tricks... OTOH I think the whole point of this:

	ret = ops->iomap_begin(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len, iter->flags,
			       &iter->iomap, &iter->srcmap);

is to "avoid" allowing the iomap users to mess with the internals of the
iomap iter...

>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
> @@ -1762,6 +1764,7 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  	 */
>  	if (flags & IOMAP_ZERO) {
>  		xfs_fileoff_t eof_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, XFS_ISIZE(ip));
> +		u64 end;
>  
>  		if (isnullstartblock(imap.br_startblock) &&
>  		    offset_fsb >= eof_fsb)
> @@ -1769,6 +1772,26 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  		if (offset_fsb < eof_fsb && end_fsb > eof_fsb)
>  			end_fsb = eof_fsb;
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Look up dirty folios for unwritten mappings within EOF.
> +		 * Providing this bypasses the flush iomap uses to trigger
> +		 * extent conversion when unwritten mappings have dirty
> +		 * pagecache in need of zeroing.
> +		 *
> +		 * Trim the mapping to the end pos of the lookup, which in turn
> +		 * was trimmed to the end of the batch if it became full before
> +		 * the end of the mapping.
> +		 */
> +		if (imap.br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN &&
> +		    offset_fsb < eof_fsb) {
> +			loff_t len = min(count,
> +					 XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, imap.br_blockcount));
> +
> +			end = iomap_fill_dirty_folios(iter, offset, len);

...though I wonder, does this need to happen in
xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin?  Is it required to hold the ILOCK while
we go look for folios in the mapping?  Or could this become a part of
iomap_write_begin?

--D

> +			end_fsb = min_t(xfs_fileoff_t, end_fsb,
> +					XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, end));
> +		}
> +
>  		xfs_trim_extent(&imap, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-09 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-05 17:33 [PATCH 0/7] iomap: zero range folio batch support Brian Foster
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] iomap: move pos+len BUG_ON() to after folio lookup Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10  4:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:16       ` Brian Foster
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] filemap: add helper to look up dirty folios in a range Brian Foster
2025-06-09 15:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10  4:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:17     ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10  4:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10  4:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:21       ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 12:21     ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 13:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 14:19         ` Brian Foster
2025-06-11  3:54           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 14:55       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-11  3:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12  4:06           ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-10  4:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: always trim mapping to requested range for zero range Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings Brian Foster
2025-06-06  2:02   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-06 15:20     ` Brian Foster
2025-06-09 16:12   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-06-10  4:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:24     ` Brian Foster
2025-07-02 18:50       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] iomap: remove old partial eof zeroing optimization Brian Foster
2025-06-10  4:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-05 17:33 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] xfs: error tag to force zeroing on debug kernels Brian Foster
2025-06-10  4:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:26     ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 13:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 14:20         ` Brian Foster
2025-06-10 19:12           ` Brian Foster
2025-06-11  3:56             ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250609161219.GE6156@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox