linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] mm: Close theoretical race where stale TLB entries could linger
Date: Fri,  6 Jun 2025 10:28:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> (raw)

Commit 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with
a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries") described a theoretical
race as such:

"""
Nadav Amit identified a theoritical race between page reclaim and
mprotect due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held.

He described the race as follows:

	CPU0                            CPU1
	----                            ----
					user accesses memory using RW PTE
					[PTE now cached in TLB]
	try_to_unmap_one()
	==> ptep_get_and_clear()
	==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending()
					mprotect(addr, PROT_READ)
					==> change_pte_range()
					==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ]

					user writes using cached RW PTE
	...

	try_to_unmap_flush()

The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and
also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such
as munmap, mremap and madvise.
"""

The solution was to introduce flush_tlb_batched_pending() and call it
under the PTL from mprotect/madvise/munmap/mremap to complete any
pending tlb flushes.

However, while madvise_free_pte_range() and
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() were both retro-fitted to call
flush_tlb_batched_pending() immediately after initially acquiring the
PTL, they both temporarily release the PTL to split a large folio if
they stumble upon one. In this case, where re-acquiring the PTL
flush_tlb_batched_pending() must be called again, but it previously was
not. Let's fix that.

There are 2 Fixes: tags here: the first is the commit that fixed
madvise_free_pte_range(). The second is the commit that added
madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(), which looks like it copy/pasted the
faulty pattern from madvise_free_pte_range().

This is a theoretical bug discovered during code review.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3ea277194daa ("mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries")
Fixes: 9c276cc65a58 ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---

Applies on today's mm-unstable (3f676fe5c7a0). All mm selftests continue to
pass.

Thanks,
Ryan

 mm/madvise.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 5f7a66a1617e..1d44a35ae85c 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
 					pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
 				if (!start_pte)
 					break;
+				flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
 				arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
 				if (!err)
 					nr = 0;
@@ -741,6 +742,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
 				start_pte = pte;
 				if (!start_pte)
 					break;
+				flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm);
 				arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
 				if (!err)
 					nr = 0;
--
2.43.0



             reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-06  9:28 Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-06-06 12:37 ` Jann Horn
2025-06-06 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250606092809.4194056-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox