[PATCH v5 04/10] mm,slub: Use node-notifier instead of memory-notifier

[Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>]

slub is only concerned when a numa node changes its memory state,
so stop using the memory notifier and use the new numa node notifer
instead.

Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
 mm/slub.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index f92b43d36adc..b8b5b81bfd1a 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -6164,8 +6164,8 @@ static int slab_mem_going_online_callback(void *arg)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache_node *n;
 	struct kmem_cache *s;
-	struct memory_notify *marg = arg;
-	int nid = marg->status_change_nid;
+	struct node_notify *narg = arg;
+	int nid = narg->nid;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -6217,15 +6217,12 @@ static int slab_memory_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	switch (action) {
-	case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
+	case NODE_ADDING_FIRST_MEMORY:
 		ret = slab_mem_going_online_callback(arg);
 		break;
-	case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
+	case NODE_REMOVING_LAST_MEMORY:
 		ret = slab_mem_going_offline_callback(arg);
 		break;
-	case MEM_ONLINE:
-	case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE:
-		break;
 	}
 	if (ret)
 		ret = notifier_from_errno(ret);
@@ -6300,7 +6297,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
 			sizeof(struct kmem_cache_node),
 			SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT, 0, 0);
 
-	hotplug_memory_notifier(slab_memory_callback, SLAB_CALLBACK_PRI);
+	hotplug_node_notifier(slab_memory_callback, SLAB_CALLBACK_PRI);
 
 	/* Able to allocate the per node structures */
 	slab_state = PARTIAL;
-- 
2.49.0