From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12B2C54E65 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 20:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 755C46B0083; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:03:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7069C6B0085; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:03:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 61C4B6B0088; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:03:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436556B0083 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:03:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB92B1212C3 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 20:03:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83467989318.29.6F5EA72 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D497160010 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 20:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Q4dITEs0; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1747857797; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=YRIXWIY/GZPftvbAZzym5xmPg4vDE6Ld3Uzg/Nx8u4A=; b=tlWNGj5xUcR/JnlGIO7mxPNYU+GOQWJjDDteux+XBdrWbfF+jtmjFaY4PpNixvUJBHYxtu yKFQyKImtgz+m/7nmLOOouwTc/wI9FTE3ArN73OH40n3KWIVyJIHUUBcW9yYhaJAM1yqqS Z4/QAHL4HwTdAh4ZiTWgp83cvQIlygg= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1747857797; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=4nRG+Z2tkUerP47n/UwpR49N9nbOzjWrLdVGbQqEk7R6Vj70FdRwGxekfU2We7lHVzdY5I jBviPFYEs9E1uO5hakelBSriC3qemaj2Q7qigc38vTdwqqvgLUprbfqVXEXhpiaZog1vrb IOPl8fsBQNoWhIA8L32OKbGqIOU2nYw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Q4dITEs0; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1747857797; x=1779393797; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=c/lBvX1t0gd9nnoWFybO/osjBDzkiXG4M59v4FZ8sf8=; b=Q4dITEs00NivuSNyclJXjHNL3N0tTZ/jyinoSOMMuUtRPnCRQjkWMWPf kdo2UWQY/wjQY+cjlCcDA81S06IMrPYVVw2/7Opm+nIS7vqfZLHNO7abJ /lXIhmriO9Flcgnm3oJbp/eyb73jU2JyJAYDm+yZ8nzzz/RaJiqQfMpTu jt3+Nd1vPOj6zJaBl10D5ywgYFyvpdjqN44mt+5pr8Gn2l7i+5kGVg/ZU Zxyf+xHWgY7nwH0B3ypYYBWc4mwydAi6CE3IDvpZuPCI5z0qOIzFP0ooU nzEyvSaOk56FUIdIVDOknWb/RW6o71HorEtTbM7WyceJhGip2tigu+sCk Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1raMQ0MySOyDbdPYq2iXDA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: eb6NM9ZEQAuatxWRPRMgzw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11440"; a="49559868" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,304,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="49559868" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2025 13:03:15 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3Bdhf4yrTLmOUTqYJ8mFWA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LOiko2IMQqO7hPfwYYrSYA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,304,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="140132394" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2025 13:03:09 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uHped-000OZc-0Q; Wed, 21 May 2025 20:03:07 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 04:02:41 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Bhupesh , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, bhupesh@igalia.com, kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, oliver.sang@intel.com, lkp@intel.com, laoar.shao@gmail.com, pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, arnaldo.melo@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, peterz@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, keescook@chromium.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] treewide: Switch memcpy() users of 'task->comm' to a more safer implementation Message-ID: <202505220326.5yDQHjnt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250521062337.53262-3-bhupesh@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250521062337.53262-3-bhupesh@igalia.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0D497160010 X-Stat-Signature: tnsq5tmx51fihwu65mp56wcx7xqna9r4 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1747857796-671290 X-HE-Meta: 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 gwhJfZzk YlPEbyaMlnbFtC8BlBz5okfB7/NkP1+O0Hm1QK7yyiaoYhtVn1HZqEIUOigtJ0mBqc4dOKzCHfubXVfohaDRfe3rhHpt9yzE9InySmTThEH1awFMFRRkQotIMJu9g+WX0Nj6cE7PJEMWR+6j5OC1qG2Dbu9AA2UE+uBrshx/ZOkzVAM+ELJYbkD+P2W0XcFG/bXOzCpu7sXsIwcJPWqKp1d4EMk2Kf1Nb1vXYA13xgHt2s7ntH9vzUf0BZ/dDvZHGerPGezcOjdkNBeMBsu8gvvRHvHzty0EiOA7qJZqsKHLE0bjt62IjIppejdgFv4aNeuA4ilTEL9s76caOjpkGF0hhjMiGWU41iXUJv+qWQLeYlJdtRB6eV3ARhPvu3/uhkJkRRbyUTijg/RRfpiE6IFxzfCkvOirbxifLI+eoq8pttZbhh5pmBUqKteyE66LiGy1JLt+D3f/rGnr7iJl9y5wB0UF8mE1TsxSSkJkHIckP0OA= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Bhupesh, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on trace/for-next] [also build test WARNING on tip/sched/core akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.15-rc7 next-20250521] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bhupesh/exec-Remove-obsolete-comments/20250521-142443 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250521062337.53262-3-bhupesh%40igalia.com patch subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] treewide: Switch memcpy() users of 'task->comm' to a more safer implementation config: arc-randconfig-002-20250522 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250522/202505220326.5yDQHjnt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250522/202505220326.5yDQHjnt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505220326.5yDQHjnt-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/coredump.c:20: fs/coredump.c: In function 'do_coredump': >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:655:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure( ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:730:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("Core dump to %s aborted: " ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:725:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("Core dump to %s aborted: " ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:618:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("over core_pipe_limit, skipping core dump"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:642:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("|%s pipe failed", cn.corename); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:625:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("%s failed to allocate memory", __func__); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:611:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("RLIMIT_CORE is set to 1, aborting core"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:591:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("format_corename failed, aborting core"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:752:4: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("Core dump to |%s disabled", cn.corename); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c: In function 'validate_coredump_safety': >> include/linux/coredump.h:57:7: warning: array subscript 16 is above array bounds of 'char[16]' [-Warray-bounds] comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/coredump.h:63:43: note: in expansion of macro '__COREDUMP_PRINTK' #define coredump_report_failure(fmt, ...) __COREDUMP_PRINTK(KERN_WARNING, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/coredump.c:1006:3: note: in expansion of macro 'coredump_report_failure' coredump_report_failure("Unsafe core_pattern used with fs.suid_dumpable=2: " ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +57 include/linux/coredump.h 46 47 /* 48 * Logging for the coredump code, ratelimited. 49 * The TGID and comm fields are added to the message. 50 */ 51 52 #define __COREDUMP_PRINTK(Level, Format, ...) \ 53 do { \ 54 char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; \ 55 /* This will always be NUL terminated. */ \ 56 memcpy(comm, current->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN); \ > 57 comm[TASK_COMM_LEN] = '\0'; \ 58 printk_ratelimited(Level "coredump: %d(%*pE): " Format "\n", \ 59 task_tgid_vnr(current), (int)strlen(comm), comm, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ 60 } while (0) \ 61 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki