From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
regressions@lists.linux.dev,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] bpf verifier slowdown due to vrealloc() change since 6.15-rc6
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:26:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250515202552.znxvzcnhpdjqmlbm@desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515175205.th7pjvord6fum35a@desk>
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:41:41AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:18:21AM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:51:15AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 07:51:26AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > On May 15, 2025 6:12:25 AM PDT, Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> wrote:
> > > > > >There is an observable slowdown when running BPF selftests on 6.15-rc6
> > > > > >kernel[1] built with tools/testing/selftests/bpf/{config,config.x86_64}.
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > Where can I find the .config for the slow runs?
> > > >
> > > > Oops, I can read. :) Doing a build now...
> > > >
> > > > > And how do I run the test myself directly?
> > > >
> > > > I found:
> > > > https://docs.kernel.org/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.html
> > > >
> > > > But it doesn't seem to cover a bunch of stuff (no way to prebuild the
> > > > tests, no info on building the test modules).
> > > >
> > > > This seems to be needed:
> > > >
> > > > make O=regression-bug -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods
> > > >
> > > > But then the booted kernel doesn't load it (missing signatures?)
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I'll keep digging...
> > >
> > > After struggling with this for a while, I figured vmtest.sh is the easiest
> > > way to test bpf:
> > >
> > > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh -i ./test_progs
> >
> > I can't even build the test_progs. :(
> >
> > $ make test_progs
> > ...
> > CLNG-BPF [test_progs] bpf_iter_tasks.bpf.o
> > progs/bpf_iter_tasks.c:98:8: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_copy_from_user_task_str'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > 98 | ret = bpf_copy_from_user_task_str((char *)task_str1, sizeof(task_str1), ptr, task, 0
> > );
> > | ^
> > 1 error generated.
>
> I just tried on the latest upstream, and I am getting the same error. My
> earlier bisection was on a stable-rc for 6.14.y:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?h=linux-6.14.y
>
> ... where it was first reported:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250515041659.smhllyarxdwp7cav@desk/
I can confirm on v6.14.7-rc2 the test verif_scale_loop3_fail is now
passing(in <10 secs) after applying your first patch (mm: vmalloc: Actually
use the in-place vrealloc region). The the test passes after applying your
second patch also.
For some reason I am unable to build the bpf selftests on latest upstream.
I may be missing something that is required on latest upstream :-(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 13:12 Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-15 14:51 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 16:51 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 17:18 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-15 17:41 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 17:52 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-05-15 20:26 ` Pawan Gupta [this message]
2025-05-15 17:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-05-15 18:24 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 18:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-15 15:47 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 15:53 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 15:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-05-15 16:01 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 18:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-05-15 21:36 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-15 21:39 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250515202552.znxvzcnhpdjqmlbm@desk \
--to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox