linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	 anup@brainfault.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
	palmer@dabbelt.com,  aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,  brauner@kernel.org,
	willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	 xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,  jarkko@kernel.org,
	amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
	 isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
	 vannapurve@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
	mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,  david@redhat.com,
	michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	 liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
	 kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	steven.price@arm.com,  quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
	quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
	 quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
	 quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com,  james.morse@arm.com,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev,  maz@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
	 roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	jgg@nvidia.com,  rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
	fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com,  jthoughton@google.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, pankaj.gupta@amd.com,  ira.weiny@intel.com,
	tabba@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 10/17] KVM: x86: Compute max_mapping_level with input from guest_memfd
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:34:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250513163438.3942405-11-tabba@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513163438.3942405-1-tabba@google.com>

From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>

This patch adds kvm_gmem_max_mapping_level(), which always returns
PG_LEVEL_4K since guest_memfd only supports 4K pages for now.

When guest_memfd supports shared memory, max_mapping_level (especially
when recovering huge pages - see call to __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level()
from recover_huge_pages_range()) should take input from
guest_memfd.

Input from guest_memfd should be taken in these cases:

+ if the memslot supports shared memory (guest_memfd is used for
  shared memory, or in future both shared and private memory) or
+ if the memslot is only used for private memory and that gfn is
  private.

If the memslot doesn't use guest_memfd, figure out the
max_mapping_level using the host page tables like before.

This patch also refactors and inlines the other call to
__kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level().

In kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(), guest_memfd's input is already
provided (if applicable) in fault->max_level. Hence, there is no need
to query guest_memfd.

lpage_info is queried like before, and then if the fault is not from
guest_memfd, adjust fault->req_level based on input from host page
tables.

Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c   | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/kvm_host.h |  7 +++
 virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c   | 12 ++++++
 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index cfbb471f7c70..9e0bc8114859 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3256,12 +3256,11 @@ static int host_pfn_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
 	return level;
 }
 
-static int __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
-				       const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-				       gfn_t gfn, int max_level, bool is_private)
+static int kvm_lpage_info_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
+					    const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+					    gfn_t gfn, int max_level)
 {
 	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
-	int host_level;
 
 	max_level = min(max_level, max_huge_page_level);
 	for ( ; max_level > PG_LEVEL_4K; max_level--) {
@@ -3270,23 +3269,61 @@ static int __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
 			break;
 	}
 
-	if (is_private)
-		return max_level;
+	return max_level;
+}
+
+static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
+{
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL > PG_LEVEL_1G);
+
+	KVM_MMU_WARN_ON(order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G) &&
+			order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M) &&
+			order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_4K));
+
+	if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G))
+		return PG_LEVEL_1G;
+
+	if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M))
+		return PG_LEVEL_2M;
+
+	return PG_LEVEL_4K;
+}
+
+static inline int kvm_gmem_max_mapping_level(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+					     gfn_t gfn, int max_level)
+{
+	int max_order;
 
 	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
 		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
 
-	host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, slot);
-	return min(host_level, max_level);
+	max_order = kvm_gmem_mapping_order(slot, gfn);
+	return min(max_level, kvm_max_level_for_order(max_order));
 }
 
 int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
 			      const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
 {
-	bool is_private = kvm_slot_has_gmem(slot) &&
-			  kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn);
+	int max_level;
+
+	max_level = kvm_lpage_info_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_NUM);
+	if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
+		return PG_LEVEL_4K;
 
-	return __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_NUM, is_private);
+	if (kvm_slot_has_gmem(slot) &&
+	    (kvm_gmem_memslot_supports_shared(slot) ||
+	     kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE)) {
+		return kvm_gmem_max_mapping_level(slot, gfn, max_level);
+	}
+
+	return min(max_level, host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, slot));
+}
+
+static inline bool fault_from_gmem(struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
+{
+	return fault->is_private ||
+	       (kvm_slot_has_gmem(fault->slot) &&
+		kvm_gmem_memslot_supports_shared(fault->slot));
 }
 
 void kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
@@ -3309,12 +3346,20 @@ void kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
 	 * Enforce the iTLB multihit workaround after capturing the requested
 	 * level, which will be used to do precise, accurate accounting.
 	 */
-	fault->req_level = __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, slot,
-						       fault->gfn, fault->max_level,
-						       fault->is_private);
+	fault->req_level = kvm_lpage_info_max_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, slot,
+							    fault->gfn, fault->max_level);
 	if (fault->req_level == PG_LEVEL_4K || fault->huge_page_disallowed)
 		return;
 
+	if (!fault_from_gmem(fault)) {
+		int host_level;
+
+		host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn, slot);
+		fault->req_level = min(fault->req_level, host_level);
+		if (fault->req_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * mmu_invalidate_retry() was successful and mmu_lock is held, so
 	 * the pmd can't be split from under us.
@@ -4448,23 +4493,6 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work)
 		vcpu->stat.pf_fixed++;
 }
 
-static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
-{
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL > PG_LEVEL_1G);
-
-	KVM_MMU_WARN_ON(order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G) &&
-			order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M) &&
-			order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_4K));
-
-	if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G))
-		return PG_LEVEL_1G;
-
-	if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M))
-		return PG_LEVEL_2M;
-
-	return PG_LEVEL_4K;
-}
-
 static u8 kvm_max_level_for_fault_and_order(struct kvm *kvm,
 					    struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
 					    int order)
@@ -4523,7 +4551,7 @@ static int __kvm_mmu_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	unsigned int foll = fault->write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0;
 
-	if (fault->is_private || kvm_gmem_memslot_supports_shared(fault->slot))
+	if (fault_from_gmem(fault))
 		return kvm_mmu_faultin_pfn_gmem(vcpu, fault);
 
 	foll |= FOLL_NOWAIT;
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index de7b46ee1762..f9bb025327c3 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -2560,6 +2560,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_mem_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
 int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 		     gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, struct page **page,
 		     int *max_order);
+int kvm_gmem_mapping_order(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 #else
 static inline int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -2569,6 +2570,12 @@ static inline int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm,
 	KVM_BUG_ON(1, kvm);
 	return -EIO;
 }
+static inline int kvm_gmem_mapping_order(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+					 gfn_t gfn)
+{
+	BUG();
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_GMEM */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_PREPARE
diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
index fe0245335c96..b8e247063b20 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
@@ -774,6 +774,18 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_gmem_get_pfn);
 
+/**
+ * Returns the mapping order for this @gfn in @slot.
+ *
+ * This is equal to max_order that would be returned if kvm_gmem_get_pfn() were
+ * called now.
+ */
+int kvm_gmem_mapping_order(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_gmem_mapping_order);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_GMEM_POPULATE
 long kvm_gmem_populate(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn, void __user *src, long npages,
 		       kvm_gmem_populate_cb post_populate, void *opaque)
-- 
2.49.0.1045.g170613ef41-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-13 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13 16:34 [PATCH v9 00/17] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GMEM Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:14   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_GMEM_POPULATE Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 21:56   ` Ira Weiny
2025-05-21  7:14   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_has_private_mem() to kvm_arch_supports_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:15   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] KVM: x86: Rename kvm->arch.has_private_mem to kvm->arch.supports_gmem Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:15   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 05/17] KVM: Rename kvm_slot_can_be_private() to kvm_slot_has_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:16   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] KVM: Fix comments that refer to slots_lock Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:16   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 18:37   ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-16 19:21     ` James Houghton
2025-05-18 15:17       ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:36         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-14  8:03   ` Shivank Garg
2025-05-14  9:45     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 10:07   ` Roy, Patrick
2025-05-14 11:30     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 20:40   ` James Houghton
2025-05-15  7:25     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-15 23:42   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16  7:31     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-16  6:08   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16  7:56     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-16 11:12       ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 14:20         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:41   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] KVM: guest_memfd: Check that userspace_addr and fd+offset refer to same range Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 20:30   ` James Houghton
2025-05-14  7:33     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 13:32       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-14 13:47         ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-14 13:52           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-14 17:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle guest page faults for guest_memfd with shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  0:40     ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-22  7:16       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  7:46         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-22  8:14           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22 10:24             ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2025-05-14  7:13   ` [PATCH v9 10/17] KVM: x86: Compute max_mapping_level with input from guest_memfd Shivank Garg
2025-05-14  7:24     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 15:27   ` kernel test robot
2025-05-21  8:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  0:45     ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-22 13:22       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-22 13:49         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  7:22     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-22  8:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  9:34         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] KVM: arm64: Rename variables in user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  2:25   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-21  9:57     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:02   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 21:26   ` James Houghton
2025-05-15  9:27     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 11:10     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-05-15 23:50   ` James Houghton
2025-05-16  7:07     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 10:12     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 10:26       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 10:29         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 12:44           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 13:15             ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 13:21               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 13:32                 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 13:45                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 14:14                     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] KVM: Introduce the KVM capability KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  2:46   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-21  8:24     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:06   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] KVM: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  6:53   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-21  9:38     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd same-range validation Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250513163438.3942405-11-tabba@google.com \
    --to=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amoorthy@google.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=keirf@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox