From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/7] memcg: make __mod_memcg_lruvec_state re-entrant safe against irqs
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 20:13:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250513031316.2147548-6-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513031316.2147548-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Let's make __mod_memcg_lruvec_state re-entrant safe and name it
mod_memcg_lruvec_state(). The only thing needed is to convert the usage
of __this_cpu_add() to this_cpu_add(). There are two callers of
mod_memcg_lruvec_state() and one of them i.e. __mod_objcg_mlstate() will
be re-entrant safe as well, so, rename it mod_objcg_mlstate(). The last
caller __mod_lruvec_state() still calls __mod_node_page_state() which is
not re-entrant safe yet, so keep it as is.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9e7dc90cc460..adf2f1922118 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ unsigned long memcg_page_state_local(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int idx)
}
#endif
-static void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
+static void mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
enum node_stat_item idx,
int val)
{
@@ -743,16 +743,20 @@ static void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
if (WARN_ONCE(BAD_STAT_IDX(i), "%s: missing stat item %d\n", __func__, idx))
return;
+ if (WARN_ONCE(in_nmi(), "%s: called in nmi context for stat item %d\n",
+ __func__, idx))
+ return;
+
pn = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
memcg = pn->memcg;
cpu = get_cpu();
/* Update memcg */
- __this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[i], val);
+ this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[i], val);
/* Update lruvec */
- __this_cpu_add(pn->lruvec_stats_percpu->state[i], val);
+ this_cpu_add(pn->lruvec_stats_percpu->state[i], val);
val = memcg_state_val_in_pages(idx, val);
memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, val, cpu);
@@ -779,7 +783,7 @@ void __mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
/* Update memcg and lruvec */
if (!mem_cgroup_disabled())
- __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(lruvec, idx, val);
+ mod_memcg_lruvec_state(lruvec, idx, val);
}
void __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(struct folio *folio, enum node_stat_item idx,
@@ -2559,7 +2563,7 @@ static void commit_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
folio->memcg_data = (unsigned long)memcg;
}
-static inline void __mod_objcg_mlstate(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
+static inline void mod_objcg_mlstate(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
struct pglist_data *pgdat,
enum node_stat_item idx, int nr)
{
@@ -2570,7 +2574,7 @@ static inline void __mod_objcg_mlstate(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
if (likely(!in_nmi())) {
lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
- __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(lruvec, idx, nr);
+ mod_memcg_lruvec_state(lruvec, idx, nr);
} else {
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn = memcg->nodeinfo[pgdat->node_id];
@@ -2901,12 +2905,12 @@ static void __account_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
struct pglist_data *oldpg = stock->cached_pgdat;
if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b) {
- __mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
+ mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b);
stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b = 0;
}
if (stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
- __mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
+ mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, oldpg, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b);
stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b = 0;
}
@@ -2932,7 +2936,7 @@ static void __account_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
}
}
if (nr)
- __mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, pgdat, idx, nr);
+ mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, pgdat, idx, nr);
}
static bool consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes,
@@ -3004,13 +3008,13 @@ static void drain_obj_stock(struct obj_stock_pcp *stock)
*/
if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b || stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
if (stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b) {
- __mod_objcg_mlstate(old, stock->cached_pgdat,
+ mod_objcg_mlstate(old, stock->cached_pgdat,
NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B,
stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b);
stock->nr_slab_reclaimable_b = 0;
}
if (stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b) {
- __mod_objcg_mlstate(old, stock->cached_pgdat,
+ mod_objcg_mlstate(old, stock->cached_pgdat,
NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b);
stock->nr_slab_unreclaimable_b = 0;
@@ -3050,7 +3054,7 @@ static void refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes,
if (unlikely(in_nmi())) {
if (pgdat)
- __mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, pgdat, idx, nr_bytes);
+ mod_objcg_mlstate(objcg, pgdat, idx, nr_bytes);
nr_pages = nr_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT;
nr_bytes = nr_bytes & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
atomic_add(nr_bytes, &objcg->nr_charged_bytes);
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-13 3:13 [RFC PATCH 0/7] memcg: make memcg stats irq safe Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] memcg: memcg_rstat_updated re-entrant safe against irqs Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 18:09 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] memcg: move preempt disable to callers of memcg_rstat_updated Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] memcg: make mod_memcg_state re-entrant safe against irqs Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] memcg: make count_memcg_events " Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 3:13 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-05-13 10:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] memcg: make __mod_memcg_lruvec_state " Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] memcg: objcg stock trylock without irq disabling Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 13:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] memcg: no stock lock for cpu hot-unplug Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 13:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250513031316.2147548-6-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox