linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/7] memcg: move preempt disable to callers of memcg_rstat_updated
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 20:13:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250513031316.2147548-3-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513031316.2147548-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

Let's move the explicit preempt disable code to the callers of
memcg_rstat_updated and also remove the memcg_stats_lock and related
functions which ensures the callers of stats update functions have
disabled preemption because now the stats update functions are
explicitly disabling preemption.

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 74 +++++++++++++------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 2c4c095bf26c..62450e7991d8 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -558,47 +558,21 @@ static u64 flush_last_time;
 
 #define FLUSH_TIME (2UL*HZ)
 
-/*
- * Accessors to ensure that preemption is disabled on PREEMPT_RT because it can
- * not rely on this as part of an acquired spinlock_t lock. These functions are
- * never used in hardirq context on PREEMPT_RT and therefore disabling preemtion
- * is sufficient.
- */
-static void memcg_stats_lock(void)
-{
-	preempt_disable_nested();
-	VM_WARN_ON_IRQS_ENABLED();
-}
-
-static void __memcg_stats_lock(void)
-{
-	preempt_disable_nested();
-}
-
-static void memcg_stats_unlock(void)
-{
-	preempt_enable_nested();
-}
-
-
 static bool memcg_vmstats_needs_flush(struct memcg_vmstats *vmstats)
 {
 	return atomic64_read(&vmstats->stats_updates) >
 		MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH * num_online_cpus();
 }
 
-static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
+static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val,
+				       int cpu)
 {
 	struct memcg_vmstats_percpu *statc;
-	int cpu;
 	int stats_updates;
 
 	if (!val)
 		return;
 
-	/* Don't assume callers have preemption disabled. */
-	cpu = get_cpu();
-
 	cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
 	statc = this_cpu_ptr(memcg->vmstats_percpu);
 	for (; statc; statc = statc->parent) {
@@ -619,7 +593,6 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
 			atomic64_add(stats_updates,
 				     &statc->vmstats->stats_updates);
 	}
-	put_cpu();
 }
 
 static void __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool force)
@@ -717,6 +690,7 @@ void __mod_memcg_state(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum memcg_stat_item idx,
 		       int val)
 {
 	int i = memcg_stats_index(idx);
+	int cpu;
 
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		return;
@@ -724,12 +698,14 @@ void __mod_memcg_state(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum memcg_stat_item idx,
 	if (WARN_ONCE(BAD_STAT_IDX(i), "%s: missing stat item %d\n", __func__, idx))
 		return;
 
-	memcg_stats_lock();
+	cpu = get_cpu();
+
 	__this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[i], val);
 	val = memcg_state_val_in_pages(idx, val);
-	memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, val);
+	memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, val, cpu);
 	trace_mod_memcg_state(memcg, idx, val);
-	memcg_stats_unlock();
+
+	put_cpu();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
@@ -758,6 +734,7 @@ static void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	int i = memcg_stats_index(idx);
+	int cpu;
 
 	if (WARN_ONCE(BAD_STAT_IDX(i), "%s: missing stat item %d\n", __func__, idx))
 		return;
@@ -765,24 +742,7 @@ static void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 	pn = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
 	memcg = pn->memcg;
 
-	/*
-	 * The caller from rmap relies on disabled preemption because they never
-	 * update their counter from in-interrupt context. For these two
-	 * counters we check that the update is never performed from an
-	 * interrupt context while other caller need to have disabled interrupt.
-	 */
-	__memcg_stats_lock();
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)) {
-		switch (idx) {
-		case NR_ANON_MAPPED:
-		case NR_FILE_MAPPED:
-		case NR_ANON_THPS:
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
-			break;
-		default:
-			VM_WARN_ON_IRQS_ENABLED();
-		}
-	}
+	cpu = get_cpu();
 
 	/* Update memcg */
 	__this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[i], val);
@@ -791,9 +751,10 @@ static void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 	__this_cpu_add(pn->lruvec_stats_percpu->state[i], val);
 
 	val = memcg_state_val_in_pages(idx, val);
-	memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, val);
+	memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, val, cpu);
 	trace_mod_memcg_lruvec_state(memcg, idx, val);
-	memcg_stats_unlock();
+
+	put_cpu();
 }
 
 /**
@@ -873,6 +834,7 @@ void __count_memcg_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum vm_event_item idx,
 			  unsigned long count)
 {
 	int i = memcg_events_index(idx);
+	int cpu;
 
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		return;
@@ -880,11 +842,13 @@ void __count_memcg_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum vm_event_item idx,
 	if (WARN_ONCE(BAD_STAT_IDX(i), "%s: missing stat item %d\n", __func__, idx))
 		return;
 
-	memcg_stats_lock();
+	cpu = get_cpu();
+
 	__this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->events[i], count);
-	memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, count);
+	memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, count, cpu);
 	trace_count_memcg_events(memcg, idx, count);
-	memcg_stats_unlock();
+
+	put_cpu();
 }
 
 unsigned long memcg_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int event)
-- 
2.47.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-13  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13  3:13 [RFC PATCH 0/7] memcg: make memcg stats irq safe Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13  3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] memcg: memcg_rstat_updated re-entrant safe against irqs Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:22   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13 18:09     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13  3:13 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-05-13 10:34   ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] memcg: move preempt disable to callers of memcg_rstat_updated Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13  3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] memcg: make mod_memcg_state re-entrant safe against irqs Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:38   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13  3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] memcg: make count_memcg_events " Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:39   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13  3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] memcg: make __mod_memcg_lruvec_state " Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 10:40   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13  3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] memcg: objcg stock trylock without irq disabling Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 13:05   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-13  3:13 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] memcg: no stock lock for cpu hot-unplug Shakeel Butt
2025-05-13 13:10   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250513031316.2147548-3-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox