From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: add a test for damos_set_filters_default_reject()
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 17:27:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250513002715.40126-5-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513002715.40126-1-sj@kernel.org>
DAMOS filters' default reject behavior is not very simple. Actually
there was a mistake[1] during the development. Add a kunit test for
validating the behavior.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/20250227002913.19359-1-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
index be0fea9ee5fc..298c67557fae 100644
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
+++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
@@ -510,6 +510,75 @@ static void damon_test_feed_loop_next_input(struct kunit *test)
damon_feed_loop_next_input(last_input, 2000));
}
+static void damon_test_set_filters_default_reject(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct damos scheme;
+ struct damos_filter *target_filter, *anon_filter;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme.filters);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme.ops_filters);
+
+ damos_set_filters_default_reject(&scheme);
+ /*
+ * No filter is installed. Allow by default on both core and ops layer
+ * filtering stages, since there are no filters at all.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.core_filters_default_reject, false);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.ops_filters_default_reject, false);
+
+ target_filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_TARGET, true, true);
+ damos_add_filter(&scheme, target_filter);
+ damos_set_filters_default_reject(&scheme);
+ /*
+ * A core-handled allow-filter is installed.
+ * Rejct by default on core layer filtering stage due to the last
+ * core-layer-filter's behavior.
+ * Allow by default on ops layer filtering stage due to the absence of
+ * ops layer filters.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.core_filters_default_reject, true);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.ops_filters_default_reject, false);
+
+ target_filter->allow = false;
+ damos_set_filters_default_reject(&scheme);
+ /*
+ * A core-handled reject-filter is installed.
+ * Allow by default on core layer filtering stage due to the last
+ * core-layer-filter's behavior.
+ * Allow by default on ops layer filtering stage due to the absence of
+ * ops layer filters.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.core_filters_default_reject, false);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.ops_filters_default_reject, false);
+
+ anon_filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON, true, true);
+ damos_add_filter(&scheme, anon_filter);
+
+ damos_set_filters_default_reject(&scheme);
+ /*
+ * A core-handled reject-filter and ops-handled allow-filter are installed.
+ * Allow by default on core layer filtering stage due to the existence
+ * of the ops-handled filter.
+ * Reject by default on ops layer filtering stage due to the last
+ * ops-layer-filter's behavior.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.core_filters_default_reject, false);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.ops_filters_default_reject, true);
+
+ target_filter->allow = true;
+ damos_set_filters_default_reject(&scheme);
+ /*
+ * A core-handled allow-filter and ops-handled allow-filter are
+ * installed.
+ * Allow by default on core layer filtering stage due to the existence
+ * of the ops-handled filter.
+ * Reject by default on ops layer filtering stage due to the last
+ * ops-layer-filter's behavior.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.core_filters_default_reject, false);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scheme.ops_filters_default_reject, true);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_target),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_regions),
@@ -527,6 +596,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_new_filter),
KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_filter_out),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_feed_loop_next_input),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_filters_default_reject),
{},
};
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-13 0:27 [PATCH 0/6] mm/damon: minor fixups and improvements for code, tests, and documents SeongJae Park
2025-05-13 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/damon/core: warn and fix nr_accesses[_bp] corruption SeongJae Park
2025-05-13 0:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: fix wrong comment on damons_sysfs_quota_goal_metric_strs SeongJae Park
2025-05-13 0:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/damon/paddr: remove unused variable, folio_list, in damon_pa_stat() SeongJae Park
2025-05-13 0:27 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-05-13 0:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/damon/_damon_sysfs: read tried regions directories in order SeongJae Park
2025-05-13 0:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] Docs/damon: update titles and brief introductions to explain DAMOS SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250513002715.40126-5-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox