From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1ADC3ABBE for ; Thu, 8 May 2025 09:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E859E6B000A; Thu, 8 May 2025 05:45:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E0B956B0082; Thu, 8 May 2025 05:45:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CAC606B0085; Thu, 8 May 2025 05:45:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB74F6B000A for ; Thu, 8 May 2025 05:45:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4F45F7F3 for ; Thu, 8 May 2025 09:45:49 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83419258818.13.7C53835 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9ABF180006 for ; Thu, 8 May 2025 09:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of jonathan.cameron@huawei.com designates 185.176.79.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1746697547; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yuB/AYSsrQlQ9KLZ01Z3ysCp+rxfn7RaQuOKY54+VTZ0mEUlYaGenmUetdoXT4EOXqvkAl GkYebGsNWxy+ssx/Kwnc1tiITp/giUMuHHG6MdYqcKeBjPcKg/JfpTwz9z7TCf5JTj2shX mzEpBQh+XLXbRRi0OUdvGnEx4IcWhIU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of jonathan.cameron@huawei.com designates 185.176.79.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1746697547; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yaTDY8TQoaNhi1fbry0T23VlETrqHAgx2SMtFKl3IO8=; b=GaPiz69qB/y9T7XTqdpzfnFsqoB8O7dUYcrgjIlCYH7KaK3EG2OrhHL21Y2d0x0DxF7WBY BIt2P5c1NXIlLH3y9VFqtH2KWaxLX8z5kYSDzVyUIfwPSEloq9wHmf1SkZM2IivM7gSR5Q Bxitbknf+9GNwO2Yxq+QakUx0ZVoXhs= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4ZtS136R71z6K9Xl; Thu, 8 May 2025 17:45:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8ECC140121; Thu, 8 May 2025 17:45:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 8 May 2025 11:45:43 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 10:45:41 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Alison Schofield CC: Yuquan Wang , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved_memblk Message-ID: <20250508104541.00007c4f@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20250508022719.3941335-1-wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E9ABF180006 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Stat-Signature: an5kfskcf9rq7gb1k1rmw54bfqadij4e X-HE-Tag: 1746697546-657959 X-HE-Meta: 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 ulgpajU5 Gu58JrE6G10WykP8NDTiP5PAS3OPoLVVteJak1y8my7m5sAqtphB5969Lyf9Xq53qMZhOwEFHjIQyUCyHSz7+XG3UwFZDRFoMksahXQI3Obxj+OsSruJeZUPwpKrkxLSfWB9zOr4gC4HfxpEbq8Tivb/a8BbNOvi4ciDjFHeye0lsC0d8EMBzptOV3X4U/3HP0DrfUsQgqDDC3fdyTgS3eoQwx2bZDIso65S7wyJMFMX4wY8M1UhGRu2Hm1ufPpCHXjRn4zeWTlllsWbuNF+E0WK5p1MOEsamtRKnjXwyFSGmDrlaT94JH9u81Q== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 7 May 2025 21:09:07 -0700 Alison Schofield wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 10:27:19AM +0800, Yuquan Wang wrote: > > acpi_parse_cfmws() currently adds empty CFMWS ranges to numa_meminfo > > with the expectation that numa_cleanup_meminfo moves them to > > numa_reserved_meminfo. There is no need for that indirection when it is > > known in advance that these unpopulated ranges are meant for > > numa_reserved_meminfo in support of future hotplug / CXL provisioning. > > > > Introduce and use numa_add_reserved_memblk() to add the empty CFMWS > > ranges directly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuquan Wang > > Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield > > > Yuquan - I'm guessing this is a misunderstanding of process. The patch submitter should pick up tags on previous versions. If any are not picked up in the tag block there should be a clear explanation of why! Jonathan