linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, bp@alien8.de,
	tglx@linutronix.de, david@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc: Ensure try_alloc_pages() plays well with unaccepted memory
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 17:00:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250506170034.2c6cb08808e60772c207233f@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506112509.905147-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

On Tue,  6 May 2025 14:25:08 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> try_alloc_pages() will not attempt to allocate memory if the system has
> *any* unaccepted memory. Memory is accepted as needed and can remain in
> the system indefinitely, causing the interface to always fail.
> 
> Rather than immediately giving up, attempt to use already accepted
> memory on free lists.
> 
> Pass 'alloc_flags' to cond_accept_memory() and do not accept new memory
> for ALLOC_TRYLOCK requests.

What are the userspace-visible effects, please?

Was the omission of cc:stable intentional?  I cannot locally determine
this without the above info.

If the cc:stable omission was indeed intentional then it would be better
if this series was presented as two standalone patches.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250506112509.905147-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <20250506112509.905147-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
2025-05-06 12:43   ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling Borislav Petkov
     [not found] ` <20250506112509.905147-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
2025-05-06 13:20   ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_alloc: Ensure try_alloc_pages() plays well with unaccepted memory Brendan Jackman
2025-05-06 13:34     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-05-07 15:27       ` Brendan Jackman
2025-05-06 17:18   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-06 19:00     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-05-06 22:05       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-07 11:13         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-05-07  0:00   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-05-07 11:31     ` Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250506170034.2c6cb08808e60772c207233f@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox