From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8453C3ABB0 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9C4B56B008A; Mon, 5 May 2025 08:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9749B6B008C; Mon, 5 May 2025 08:11:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 81A676B0092; Mon, 5 May 2025 08:11:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED526B008A for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 08:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F291C9F12 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:11:26 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83408739372.03.92570B9 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1724FC0005 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 12:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=i3JsTljU; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1746447084; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=JewlQdgo0qO7aOxEtBwemQb1XlSk5YtdmzDqoXdfmVhm0Ga/WAICp3e/bybOgaZc418KCv CHx7OVCXsAUZ4KMCTkLLBvZ+LmQk6FHB39FaejLN9VyLdkHov2MhxUp9YT4ZXu9Xf2KGj8 POMiWCEX4ZC6CCM69GwLqgiOj/6e4d4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=i3JsTljU; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1746447084; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=qUBRVaeRKZkRGNWexayzKie88EuPaD8ScCjFWhh5deY=; b=1DDtdiCaariupzypRM126QEDJI58k+ZpZFrdl5osmw0E6+n861ipBGJ4nu3gBQ71yHIa8N KTwjNCeb9XolrsdXmtMF/g3kxVho4u7m2Q6SxkhqEuWiYjpyif53ZXSGQSvDQvILf24793 xTBukFGVrSDXz28MgOU0I+s4er7OOzs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746447084; x=1777983084; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bxaZJKzN4o4K93+jRibQUfVTUKlyCaXeSBSGun1gpoI=; b=i3JsTljU43s4E6qoZ22ONCUSt7hGy9mdH6IEKUobd3c/u2/3y0jtjdji HnTkjzwzs1R6sNDnkt9fkXDD2dSVtDGRAuNIg9GpT4N+8EtaCSglSYBmv hxSms1oh4yUq3Gf6yM5TjAcYUvLvxs9NMoWY9X4CzOtlOVTuPSkWA667S cKy65xcz/m+wyiA+36z073Pd+Ik4vwDy4CjEl6XK8H+0C9+hcj0xANZZ1 N/xdPDxbVe1RpWEiP7JqJFYK5Vlhy+7qIx2qQrEoFAMVorcnqyzoQjAUJ t0b085h1evZ7EE6hKiOD8D2ZHREcmoYVrer2RSxogZUwRGwgOsEvn8/7B Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rVtO79etS1Orft53jyw6ZA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gJt8Ok5GTTOcB+p83kd6LQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11423"; a="73445526" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,262,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="73445526" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 May 2025 05:11:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: O7eKqblEQhGvMWo4WbvYxw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VA9AJlB/RGuacaen0jP/NQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,262,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="136182857" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 May 2025 05:11:20 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uBufG-0005hx-0U; Mon, 05 May 2025 12:11:18 +0000 Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 20:11:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu() instead of "disabled" field Message-ID: <202505051827.xKU53TzL-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250502205349.299144667@goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250502205349.299144667@goodmis.org> X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1724FC0005 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Stat-Signature: m5mf54kux79tquh5zdn4o4kj91qe47zn X-HE-Tag: 1746447083-17264 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1+AGiP791YbviUQqYxpdSU/BR9AE5WVAPEiDOP69RW4ma5p9OC89eNV5AMABfgPCytVaee0A5DTQdxCvOC0uF+j8+K2Wwq8b2MjAD1oLMd5wPAMEX/VZRHouwFxGQ4ym6U3mCV88sJYrf7Q95aiZLEpltJARETOPMSYk6te3AwVi+6qpw7duDloyd8HZL7pwTq2+RLXekguFGXuzFiV0/+EUm3BmirR/G32HbtURlPi8cSFZCzxRGj0sozuyFMpXnBpO0asaq+OvvFQu1mN02ZMxAJKz4ztBm5kcOfHwzuGaq7ZGJQIHIAup4MCj+8sud9lpj4raeuIJrzfVXYbtKNPh+t93n2+ADVnvxkHFz5V9sBp75B/acx2vBhKbevIGsHsj2rFOvQ5kz4yvEuoMQq4/xKJUL9eteec6jD8j/tQFOpGt0EgGG4TmmQ+QmoxN0vt4I/Y+fZAnr4G3kugLWvuBCmHsUCyerHslGRN0ywDSFzx28FUebykb9pcrEBxVeFGbxcSVh6l8kJ0PJ/h4oueMZahNDZV4kMYQvvdJ/mt+ytAibZVLw2tKWw+E/WVw0LhWJc0wSjMsudJOfgggu1+j4YqoPxD+fzldw50aDk1zqLC4GrLa/PlFlJJBijTU6LXl+Qh7LStJhcYYeu2OlBB0wl+DGKXrKe4VVKkRbfUkIhH1IxBXuh7/bwDy5XDvwF8Fly+dKtjexDKejIehyTaB9C5LjJbsDwR8bR3mOlBkpABBRibzH23iSPa9fNeRmtcVScHS2gzUCt+bJdrYlZ419WuQH+kg5wFsP9Y37O9sqXIp4IN7Yt49dgAqOhktzGq5SIfr8HmyFoxlEbzNi3KdSLIGt0ZgyIkROxPmTbD2fPr/lt4pITSolQ5vUhN32BQ4+tKPAswRFZKoT5NBGfYHuT/qZmZhOdqmyGB+y4Oab34B6AEF2J0bSlz7ZKsvioidKpRJWj 12HVAefE KMfVe9FXzRTMLufqEIm+svF+JUXUeaxbHmAq+It0sLXpwvB8LhR3Fvo28ifoiyC3L/NHntN1BA0WYLr7aagEvTE1A3GKacCpbjpzLjQyyh053VYtLi/HlC5B8gCTVnPLxI+b0UtVzTjiSBHe18O/h53zhp2Ge4Dxc0jfZjMIlBVJQQNSTCvoNPGn7X38ErYTnkkejPbkWsP3TYghgygeBp6zYqk7WklX48tXgFfmkZtng43l6/2EgTA0PdmgFezOnOjfRLv4kCnib+BKAt4H3XNrhbiNgz0KPd7FTvJXz3YHMTqbd+WFWCbC8WNHN1RaHI/T9/JLsEp8gN6ESJapi4Rd3aiQDM0bw06hJVYiQ+7ozl+LfPXpXe6w9Q8tf10vBnkXHYyF0+VDQJwj0S4tSBV87tO58a5uGdESaS2oMMdndiqTxiADHjR4nHZKCQXHv2cJfSNV4SNJxGgE= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Steven, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc5 next-20250502] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-mmiotrace-Remove-reference-to-unused-per-CPU-data-pointer/20250503-050317 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502205349.299144667%40goodmis.org patch subject: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu() instead of "disabled" field config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250505 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250505/202505051827.xKU53TzL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.2 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 58df0ef89dd64126512e4ee27b4ac3fd8ddf6247) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250505/202505051827.xKU53TzL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505051827.xKU53TzL-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c:56:36: error: call to undeclared function 'raw_smp_process_id'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 56 | if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id())) | ^ kernel/trace/trace_branch.c:56:36: note: did you mean 'safe_smp_processor_id'? arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h:140:12: note: 'safe_smp_processor_id' declared here 140 | extern int safe_smp_processor_id(void); | ^ 1 error generated. vim +/raw_smp_process_id +56 kernel/trace/trace_branch.c 29 30 static void 31 probe_likely_condition(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val, int expect) 32 { 33 struct trace_array *tr = branch_tracer; 34 struct trace_buffer *buffer; 35 struct ring_buffer_event *event; 36 struct trace_branch *entry; 37 unsigned long flags; 38 unsigned int trace_ctx; 39 const char *p; 40 41 if (current->trace_recursion & TRACE_BRANCH_BIT) 42 return; 43 44 /* 45 * I would love to save just the ftrace_likely_data pointer, but 46 * this code can also be used by modules. Ugly things can happen 47 * if the module is unloaded, and then we go and read the 48 * pointer. This is slower, but much safer. 49 */ 50 51 if (unlikely(!tr)) 52 return; 53 54 raw_local_irq_save(flags); 55 current->trace_recursion |= TRACE_BRANCH_BIT; > 56 if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id())) 57 goto out; 58 59 trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx_flags(flags); 60 buffer = tr->array_buffer.buffer; 61 event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_BRANCH, 62 sizeof(*entry), trace_ctx); 63 if (!event) 64 goto out; 65 66 entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event); 67 68 /* Strip off the path, only save the file */ 69 p = f->data.file + strlen(f->data.file); 70 while (p >= f->data.file && *p != '/') 71 p--; 72 p++; 73 74 strscpy(entry->func, f->data.func); 75 strscpy(entry->file, p); 76 entry->constant = f->constant; 77 entry->line = f->data.line; 78 entry->correct = val == expect; 79 80 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_nostack(buffer, event); 81 82 out: 83 current->trace_recursion &= ~TRACE_BRANCH_BIT; 84 raw_local_irq_restore(flags); 85 } 86 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki