From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A12C369D9 for ; Sat, 3 May 2025 10:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6A67A6B00A9; Sat, 3 May 2025 06:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6560F6B00AA; Sat, 3 May 2025 06:10:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4F68C6B00AD; Sat, 3 May 2025 06:10:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC4D6B00A9 for ; Sat, 3 May 2025 06:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7D8CB497 for ; Sat, 3 May 2025 10:10:51 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83401177902.27.1C18E58 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B860640007 for ; Sat, 3 May 2025 10:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=guipMiJ8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1746267049; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gjUyX+5ZnoqGvr27eVsMqYNOhdfd3q7Ofg1YMC2ZN2wiE0LhDt2kox6uSBaPgaVbCTFM+o BFGfNwg1SzhKuhkDdsJSG3KJl6QSDFzFoHGRbwXNZCTgwpqkht/XJbe19WeB7+/2sI+Mjm iBKfIdRuvA5wVMHphRwra42yTUeUg9o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=guipMiJ8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1746267049; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Fqg2lbTFT16c5gl/w3rd6Svd/hPv/qx1QKCoKGipYOk=; b=McrBFOxcTKacmZknnExPhEBkn7ueo+M7nYah1o2W0Ze7WSkHZJ0liLjQhWo1nlw8dKd8jm OQFXFkAU41vCmfoPESPmbRynYlYzejEz/2L+2viygEBZSZe0ZrTH+kr/XQkgRUryLfBswu A5OHQmoveaLvNlSwWRgdVJ/e10VTJnU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746267049; x=1777803049; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xk/wEgqqIO2by4Z2qvxQ7ilU/SdwMkhsAd06Cg0FC4E=; b=guipMiJ8LiQuk5RddzEUQen/BJpQeRkvpltR53acR0MxatmQZpgvhMzL aipwqZiM+YcBrvEOy5HfpDMhCUT5NSKn/YbMKg3s9LwGwOdzdBfwjjDwL zuBfQR+rM7C6ZSE+AVNng3ef1FOKfUBhQsluI/R+55co6YeKFFh0+lSgq RevDOngKNK0ssbSzuuI3M79h6aVCukiFcByCpeD6wo4fWTSUP2qUlAp6g rPgyJSg6YoisndE4qk+ZAYh/GFPeTwuTi2Ie9vm1BexvN7j3/PdiNUkSw ju5Sn8ifm1q6vsy/odYxFWoeOiSqZOYegsDxDwqZYQhywBBLe04zPIM2R w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OvbRE8bkQGC7u88CTLC3Uw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9idvvdEERc24Ybh5Krpnhw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11421"; a="47821847" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,258,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="47821847" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 May 2025 03:10:47 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BNpdvW4RT16cYCbbG1zdoQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Np7Cl7wiQS6yWBIt/JW9VA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,258,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="139986440" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 May 2025 03:10:45 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uB9pS-0005I9-1Q; Sat, 03 May 2025 10:10:42 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 18:10:14 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu() instead of "disabled" field Message-ID: <202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250502205349.299144667@goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250502205349.299144667@goodmis.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B860640007 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Stat-Signature: y1t66w3i11rt9bqq777cpxos4b7nu45k X-HE-Tag: 1746267048-751418 X-HE-Meta: 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 M40HKi0K 8jruLRvZBWBuFS8u5y3X3Oo4JFrfU9GOi81NrKqaf9xf8JotyplOfRUtTTxp1oEzZV3ChcpTOfD/IY1pLsINKk+yKDfdVQ9ApBdjN6qfQooEChyukUijGrcfSR5tBFjMFAIW8yxtRPmohlAQZUAqNsEMcBz6rV81r7CDISPMYenKbgDjGWB9yxq9/l0Fq2uaBobfRhtuvuASCS4RCaJnVT2gtKbuV+xOgovbFxYU0JdxZmhuc6DSfUic205J5Cvl+/cfIJBrDNv1agVBPpMV0azZVkWehkOEnv/UfAbTIF6PmZoAldIe0nXVMK2FnEpxjH+xfJQytXGDBCid80Tm5V7hWTN30zr+TdlObuRMjgOnvDYOxUEeLtL3DZfObnBf0zer9Q4OlL4NV2y9g/iOkMrbjibZaUDIH8P9F+pEY4Db8quUQiUvn5UzaV0aEct+OvImzjCurPGV0wAk= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Steven, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc4 next-20250502] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/tracing-mmiotrace-Remove-reference-to-unused-per-CPU-data-pointer/20250503-050317 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502205349.299144667%40goodmis.org patch subject: [PATCH 09/12] tracing: branch: Use trace_tracing_is_on_cpu() instead of "disabled" field config: arc-randconfig-001-20250503 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250503/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250503/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505031738.buFg2SBt-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/trace/trace_branch.c: In function 'probe_likely_condition': >> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c:56:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'raw_smp_process_id'; did you mean 'raw_smp_processor_id'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 56 | if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id())) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | raw_smp_processor_id vim +56 kernel/trace/trace_branch.c 29 30 static void 31 probe_likely_condition(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val, int expect) 32 { 33 struct trace_array *tr = branch_tracer; 34 struct trace_buffer *buffer; 35 struct ring_buffer_event *event; 36 struct trace_branch *entry; 37 unsigned long flags; 38 unsigned int trace_ctx; 39 const char *p; 40 41 if (current->trace_recursion & TRACE_BRANCH_BIT) 42 return; 43 44 /* 45 * I would love to save just the ftrace_likely_data pointer, but 46 * this code can also be used by modules. Ugly things can happen 47 * if the module is unloaded, and then we go and read the 48 * pointer. This is slower, but much safer. 49 */ 50 51 if (unlikely(!tr)) 52 return; 53 54 raw_local_irq_save(flags); 55 current->trace_recursion |= TRACE_BRANCH_BIT; > 56 if (!tracer_tracing_is_on_cpu(tr, raw_smp_process_id())) 57 goto out; 58 59 trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx_flags(flags); 60 buffer = tr->array_buffer.buffer; 61 event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_BRANCH, 62 sizeof(*entry), trace_ctx); 63 if (!event) 64 goto out; 65 66 entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event); 67 68 /* Strip off the path, only save the file */ 69 p = f->data.file + strlen(f->data.file); 70 while (p >= f->data.file && *p != '/') 71 p--; 72 p++; 73 74 strscpy(entry->func, f->data.func); 75 strscpy(entry->file, p); 76 entry->constant = f->constant; 77 entry->line = f->data.line; 78 entry->correct = val == expect; 79 80 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_nostack(buffer, event); 81 82 out: 83 current->trace_recursion &= ~TRACE_BRANCH_BIT; 84 raw_local_irq_restore(flags); 85 } 86 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki