From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, harry.yoo@oracle.com, jannh@google.com,
baohua@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 0/5] Make anon_vma operations testable
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:41:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250430154151.5r2co4unxjmgxscm@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15f2408b-d0e9-4885-9abb-ef7867587ce7@lucifer.local>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 03:38:59PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:15:03PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:31:07AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> >Wei,
>> >
>> >NACK the whole series.
>> >
>> >I'm really not sure how to get through to you. You were _explicitly_
>> >advised not to send this series. And yet you've sent it anyway.
>> >
>> >I mean, I appreciate your enthusiasm and the fact you've made tests here
>> >etc. obviously. And you've clearly put a TON of work in. But I just don't
>> >know why you would when explicitly told not to without at least discussing
>> >it first?
>> >
>>
>> Would you minding letting me know what is a preferred way of discussion?
>>
>> Send a question to mail list?
>
>Yeah, you can use [DISCUSSION] tags for such things.
>
Thanks for your information.
>>
>> ---
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 9:06 Wei Yang
2025-04-29 9:06 ` [RFC Patch 1/5] mm: move anon_vma manipulation functions to own file Wei Yang
2025-04-29 9:06 ` [RFC Patch 2/5] anon_vma: add skeleton code for userland testing of anon_vma logic Wei Yang
2025-05-01 1:31 ` Wei Yang
2025-05-01 9:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 14:45 ` Wei Yang
2025-04-29 9:06 ` [RFC Patch 3/5] anon_vma: add test for mergeable anon_vma Wei Yang
2025-04-29 9:06 ` [RFC Patch 4/5] anon_vma: add test for reusable anon_vma Wei Yang
2025-04-29 9:06 ` [RFC Patch 5/5] anon_vma: add test to assert no double-reuse Wei Yang
2025-04-29 9:31 ` [RFC Patch 0/5] Make anon_vma operations testable Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 9:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 23:56 ` Wei Yang
2025-04-30 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30 15:44 ` Wei Yang
2025-04-30 21:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-14 1:23 ` Wei Yang
2025-05-27 6:34 ` Wei Yang
2025-05-27 11:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-28 1:17 ` Wei Yang
2025-05-30 2:11 ` Wei Yang
2025-05-30 8:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-30 14:05 ` Wei Yang
2025-05-30 14:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-30 23:23 ` Wei Yang
2025-06-03 21:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 23:15 ` Wei Yang
2025-04-30 14:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 15:41 ` Wei Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250430154151.5r2co4unxjmgxscm@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox