From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ruihan Li <lrh2000@pku.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:52:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423081828.608422-4-dwmw2@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423081828.608422-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Implement for_each_valid_pfn() based on two helper functions.
The first_valid_pfn() function largely mirrors pfn_valid(), calling into
a pfn_section_first_valid() helper which is trivial for the !VMEMMAP case,
and in the VMEMMAP case will skip to the next subsection as needed.
Since next_valid_pfn() knows that its argument *is* a valid PFN, it
doesn't need to do any checking at all while iterating over the low bits
within a (sub)section mask; the whole (sub)section is either present or
not.
Note that the VMEMMAP version of pfn_section_first_valid() may return a
value *higher* than end_pfn when skipping to the next subsection, and
first_valid_pfn() happily returns that higher value. This is fine.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Previous-revision-reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
---
include/asm-generic/memory_model.h | 26 ++++++++--
include/linux/mmzone.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
index 74d0077cc5fa..044536da3390 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
@@ -31,12 +31,28 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
}
#define pfn_valid pfn_valid
+static inline bool first_valid_pfn(unsigned long *pfn)
+{
+ /* avoid <linux/mm.h> include hell */
+ extern unsigned long max_mapnr;
+ unsigned long pfn_offset = ARCH_PFN_OFFSET;
+
+ if (*pfn < pfn_offset) {
+ *pfn = pfn_offset;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ if ((*pfn - pfn_offset) < max_mapnr)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
#ifndef for_each_valid_pfn
-#define for_each_valid_pfn(pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) \
- for ((pfn) = max_t(unsigned long, (start_pfn), ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); \
- (pfn) < min_t(unsigned long, (end_pfn), \
- ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr); \
- (pfn)++)
+#define for_each_valid_pfn(pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) \
+ for (pfn = max_t(unsigned long, start_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); \
+ pfn < min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr); \
+ pfn++)
#endif /* for_each_valid_pfn */
#endif /* valid_pfn */
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 230a29c2ed1a..dab1d31477d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -2075,11 +2075,37 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
return usage ? test_bit(idx, usage->subsection_map) : 0;
}
+
+static inline bool pfn_section_first_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long *pfn)
+{
+ struct mem_section_usage *usage = READ_ONCE(ms->usage);
+ int idx = subsection_map_index(*pfn);
+ unsigned long bit;
+
+ if (!usage)
+ return false;
+
+ if (test_bit(idx, usage->subsection_map))
+ return true;
+
+ /* Find the next subsection that exists */
+ bit = find_next_bit(usage->subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION, idx);
+ if (bit == SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION)
+ return false;
+
+ *pfn = (*pfn & PAGE_SECTION_MASK) + (bit * PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION);
+ return true;
+}
#else
static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
{
return 1;
}
+
+static inline bool pfn_section_first_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long *pfn)
+{
+ return true;
+}
#endif
void sparse_init_early_section(int nid, struct page *map, unsigned long pnum,
@@ -2128,6 +2154,58 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
return ret;
}
+
+/* Returns end_pfn or higher if no valid PFN remaining in range */
+static inline unsigned long first_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+ unsigned long nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
+
+ rcu_read_lock_sched();
+
+ while (nr <= __highest_present_section_nr && pfn < end_pfn) {
+ struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
+
+ if (valid_section(ms) &&
+ (early_section(ms) || pfn_section_first_valid(ms, &pfn))) {
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ return pfn;
+ }
+
+ /* Nothing left in this section? Skip to next section */
+ nr++;
+ pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(nr);
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ return end_pfn;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+ pfn++;
+
+ if (pfn >= end_pfn)
+ return end_pfn;
+
+ /*
+ * Either every PFN within the section (or subsection for VMEMMAP) is
+ * valid, or none of them are. So there's no point repeating the check
+ * for every PFN; only call first_valid_pfn() the first time, and when
+ * crossing a (sub)section boundary (i.e. !(pfn & ~PFN_VALID_MASK)).
+ */
+ if (pfn & (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) ?
+ PAGE_SUBSECTION_MASK : PAGE_SECTION_MASK))
+ return pfn;
+
+ return first_valid_pfn(pfn, end_pfn);
+}
+
+
+#define for_each_valid_pfn(_pfn, _start_pfn, _end_pfn) \
+ for ((_pfn) = first_valid_pfn((_start_pfn), (_end_pfn)); \
+ (_pfn) < (_end_pfn); \
+ (_pfn) = next_valid_pfn((_pfn), (_end_pfn)))
+
#endif
static inline int pfn_in_present_section(unsigned long pfn)
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 7:52 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2025-04-23 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 12:05 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm, PM: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in kernel/power/snapshot.c David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm, x86: Use for_each_valid_pfn() from __ioremap_check_ram() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in memory_hotplug David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-23 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm/mm_init: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in init_unavailable_range() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 9:35 ` Ruihan Li
2025-04-23 11:14 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250423081828.608422-4-dwmw2@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lrh2000@pku.edu.cn \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox