From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Switch from -Wvla to -Wvla-larger-than=0
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:17:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250421161725.GA3253782@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250418213235.work.532-kees@kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:32:39PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Variable Length Arrays (VLAs) on the stack must not be used in the kernel.
> Function parameter VLAs[1] should be usable, but -Wvla will warn for
> those. For example, this will produce a warning but it is not using a
> stack VLA:
>
> int something(size_t n, int array[n]) { ...
>
> Clang has no way yet to distinguish between the VLA types[2], so
> depend on GCC for now to keep stack VLAs out of the tree by using GCC's
> -Wvla-larger-than=0 option (though GCC may split -Wvla[3] similarly to
> how Clang is planning to).
>
> Switch to -Wvla-larger-than=0 and adjust the two VLA-checking selftests
> to disable the updated option name.
>
> Link: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/array [1]
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57098 [2]
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98217 [3]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> mm/kasan/Makefile | 2 +-
> scripts/Makefile.extrawarn | 9 +++++++--
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index f07b24ce1b3f..37b6e5782ecb 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ CFLAGS_test_bitops.o += -Werror
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL) += test_sysctl.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_IDA) += test_ida.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_UBSAN) += test_ubsan.o
> -CFLAGS_test_ubsan.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, vla)
> +CFLAGS_test_ubsan.o += $(call cc-option, -Wno-vla-larger-than)
> CFLAGS_test_ubsan.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
> UBSAN_SANITIZE_test_ubsan.o := y
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_KSTRTOX) += test-kstrtox.o
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/Makefile b/mm/kasan/Makefile
> index 1a958e7c8a46..0e326116a70b 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/Makefile
> +++ b/mm/kasan/Makefile
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ CFLAGS_shadow.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_RUNTIME)
> CFLAGS_hw_tags.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_RUNTIME)
> CFLAGS_sw_tags.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_RUNTIME)
>
> -CFLAGS_KASAN_TEST := $(CFLAGS_KASAN) $(call cc-disable-warning, vla)
> +CFLAGS_KASAN_TEST := $(CFLAGS_KASAN) $(call cc-option, -Wno-vla-larger-than)
> ifndef CONFIG_CC_HAS_KASAN_MEMINTRINSIC_PREFIX
> # If compiler instruments memintrinsics by prefixing them with __asan/__hwasan,
> # we need to treat them normally (as builtins), otherwise the compiler won't
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> index d75897559d18..0229b10c5d81 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> @@ -45,8 +45,13 @@ endif
> # These result in bogus false positives
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, dangling-pointer)
>
> -# Variable Length Arrays (VLAs) should not be used anywhere in the kernel
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wvla
> +# Stack Variable Length Arrays (VLAs) must not be used in the kernel.
> +# Function array parameters should, however, be usable, but -Wvla will
> +# warn for those. Clang has no way yet to distinguish between the VLA
> +# types, so depend on GCC for now to keep stack VLAs out of the tree.
> +# https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57098
> +# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98217
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wvla-larger-than=0)
>
> # disable pointer signed / unsigned warnings in gcc 4.0
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-pointer-sign
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-21 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 21:32 Kees Cook
2025-04-21 9:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-21 16:43 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-21 16:17 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-04-21 21:30 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250421161725.GA3253782@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox