linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	mingzhe.yang@ly.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lance Yang" <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: add CONFIG_MM_ID guard for folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared()
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:22:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250421122239.710f5d63487853556cb8f57e@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <641755b75b4ecb9c9822e15e707a0ebf1e250788@linux.dev>

On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 05:13:03 +0000 "Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev> wrote:

> > Can we just slap "#ifdef CONFIG_MM_ID" around the whole function? It
> > 
> > should have no callers, right? If the linker ends up complaining then
> > 
> > something went wrong.
> 
> The reason we can't simply add #ifdef CONFIG_MM_ID around folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared()
> is because its caller folio_maybe_mapped_shared() relies on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MM_ID).
> 
> If we do, with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=N, we'll hit compilation errors like:
> 
> ./include/linux/mm.h: In function ‘folio_maybe_mapped_shared’:
> ./include/linux/mm.h:2337:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared’; did you mean ‘folio_maybe_mapped_shared’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  2337 |         return folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared(folio);
>       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                folio_maybe_mapped_shared
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

That's OK - provide a declaration of folio_maybe_mapped_shared() but no
definition.  So the compiled-out code can be compiled and the linker
will confirm that it's never actually called.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-18 15:22 Lance Yang
2025-04-20 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-21  5:13   ` Lance Yang
2025-04-21  5:16     ` Lance Yang
2025-04-21  7:17       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-21  7:50         ` Lance Yang
2025-04-21 19:22     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-04-22  4:35       ` Lance Yang
2025-04-22  7:00         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-22 23:20           ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250421122239.710f5d63487853556cb8f57e@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingzhe.yang@ly.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox