From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
mingzhe.yang@ly.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lance Yang" <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/1] mm/rmap: add CONFIG_MM_ID guard for folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared()
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:22:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250421122239.710f5d63487853556cb8f57e@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <641755b75b4ecb9c9822e15e707a0ebf1e250788@linux.dev>
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 05:13:03 +0000 "Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev> wrote:
> > Can we just slap "#ifdef CONFIG_MM_ID" around the whole function? It
> >
> > should have no callers, right? If the linker ends up complaining then
> >
> > something went wrong.
>
> The reason we can't simply add #ifdef CONFIG_MM_ID around folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared()
> is because its caller folio_maybe_mapped_shared() relies on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MM_ID).
>
> If we do, with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=N, we'll hit compilation errors like:
>
> ./include/linux/mm.h: In function ‘folio_maybe_mapped_shared’:
> ./include/linux/mm.h:2337:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared’; did you mean ‘folio_maybe_mapped_shared’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 2337 | return folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared(folio);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | folio_maybe_mapped_shared
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
That's OK - provide a declaration of folio_maybe_mapped_shared() but no
definition. So the compiled-out code can be compiled and the linker
will confirm that it's never actually called.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-21 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 15:22 Lance Yang
2025-04-20 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-21 5:13 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-21 5:16 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-21 7:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-21 7:50 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-21 19:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-04-22 4:35 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-22 7:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-22 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250421122239.710f5d63487853556cb8f57e@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingzhe.yang@ly.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox