[PATCH 4/4] vmalloc: Align nr_vmalloc_pages and vmap_lazy_nr

["Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>]

Currently both atomics share one cache-line:

<snip>
...
ffffffff83eab400 b vmap_lazy_nr
ffffffff83eab408 b nr_vmalloc_pages
...
<snip>

those are global variables and they are only 8 bytes apart.
Since they are modified by different threads this causes a
false sharing. This can lead to a performance drop due to
unnecessary cache invalidations.

After this patch it is aligned to a cache line boundary:

<snip>
...
ffffffff8260a600 d vmap_lazy_nr
ffffffff8260a640 d nr_vmalloc_pages
...
<snip>

Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 77da4613f07ff..54f60d62051da 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -1008,7 +1008,8 @@ static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(vmap_notify_list);
 static void drain_vmap_area_work(struct work_struct *work);
 static DECLARE_WORK(drain_vmap_work, drain_vmap_area_work);
 
-static atomic_long_t nr_vmalloc_pages;
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp atomic_long_t nr_vmalloc_pages;
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp atomic_long_t vmap_lazy_nr;
 
 unsigned long vmalloc_nr_pages(void)
 {
@@ -2117,8 +2118,6 @@ static unsigned long lazy_max_pages(void)
 	return log * (32UL * 1024 * 1024 / PAGE_SIZE);
 }
 
-static atomic_long_t vmap_lazy_nr = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
-
 /*
  * Serialize vmap purging.  There is no actual critical section protected
  * by this lock, but we want to avoid concurrent calls for performance
-- 
2.39.5