From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
brauner@kernel.org
Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, hare@suse.de,
djwong@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block()
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:16:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415231635.83960-6-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415231635.83960-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
Convert to the new nonatomic flavor to benefit from potential
performance benefits and adapt in the future vs migration such
that semantics are kept.
- jbd2_journal_revoke(): can sleep (has might_sleep() in the beginning)
- jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(): only used from do_get_write_access() and
do_get_create_access() which do sleep. So can sleep.
- jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags() - only called from journal commit code
which sleeps. So can sleep.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
---
fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
index 0cf0fddbee81..1467f6790747 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
bh = bh_in;
if (!bh) {
- bh = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
+ bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
+ journal->j_blocksize);
if (bh)
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "found on hash");
}
@@ -355,7 +356,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
/* If there is a different buffer_head lying around in
* memory anywhere... */
- bh2 = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
+ bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
+ journal->j_blocksize);
if (bh2) {
/* ... and it has RevokeValid status... */
if (bh2 != bh && buffer_revokevalid(bh2))
@@ -464,7 +466,8 @@ void jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
* state machine will get very upset later on. */
if (need_cancel) {
struct buffer_head *bh2;
- bh2 = __find_get_block(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr, bh->b_size);
+ bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr,
+ bh->b_size);
if (bh2) {
if (bh2 != bh)
clear_buffer_revoked(bh2);
@@ -492,9 +495,9 @@ void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record;
struct buffer_head *bh;
record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry;
- bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev,
- record->blocknr,
- journal->j_blocksize);
+ bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(journal->j_fs_dev,
+ record->blocknr,
+ journal->j_blocksize);
if (bh) {
clear_buffer_revoked(bh);
__brelse(bh);
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-15 23:16 [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs/buffer: split locking for pagecache lookups Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:32 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/buffer: introduce sleeping flavors " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs/buffer: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs/ocfs2: " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2025-04-16 9:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: " Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs/ext4: use sleeping version of sb_find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:39 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/migrate: fix sleep in atomic for large folios and buffer heads Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:43 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-16 19:27 ` [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-17 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-22 11:25 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-17 9:58 ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-18 1:59 [PATCH v2 " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-18 1:59 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250415231635.83960-6-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox