From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Sergio Perez Gonzalez <sperezglz@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Decouple slab_debug and no_hash_pointers
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:00:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504150956.9AFF9545@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_0AFjai6Bvg-YLD@pathway.suse.cz>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2025-04-10 10:44:31, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
> > but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
> > to the implicit "no_hash_pointers" boot param setting.[1]
> >
> > Introduce the "hash_pointers" boot param, which defaults to "auto"
> > (the current behavior), but also includes "always" (forcing on hashing
> > even when "slab_debug=..." is defined), and "never". The existing
> > "no_hash_pointers" boot param becomes an alias for "hash_pointers=never".
> >
> > This makes it possible to boot with "slab_debug=FPZ hash_pointers=always".
>
> The idea makes sense. But it seems that the patch did not handle
> the "always" mode correctly, see below.
Actually, it was the "never" mode that was being ignored. Whoops! (The
double negation language is a little odd.) I've fixed this for v2 with
an explicit switch statement.
> > -int __init no_hash_pointers_enable(char *str)
> > +void __init hash_pointers_finalize(bool slub_debug)
> > {
> > - if (no_hash_pointers)
> > - return 0;
> > + if (hash_pointers_mode == HASH_PTR_AUTO && slub_debug)
> > + no_hash_pointers = true;
> >
> > - no_hash_pointers = true;
> > + if (!no_hash_pointers)
> > + return;
> >
> > pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
> > pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **\n");
>
>
> The mode/policy is generic but this function is ready to be called
> only once. And we might actually want to call it twice, see below.
I'd like to keep it a single call. I feel this simplifies the reporting
logic, keeps the selection logic in one place, and allows us to
trivially examine that it is safe to use with __init.
Thanks for the review!
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 17:44 Kees Cook
2025-04-11 7:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-13 23:00 ` David Rientjes
2025-04-13 23:57 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-14 12:31 ` Petr Mladek
2025-04-15 17:00 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202504150956.9AFF9545@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sperezglz@gmail.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tamird@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox