linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
To: <seanjc@google.com>, <david@redhat.com>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	<willy@infradead.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<shuah@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <ackerleytng@google.com>, <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	<jmorris@namei.org>, <serge@hallyn.com>, <pvorel@suse.cz>,
	<bfoster@redhat.com>, <tabba@google.com>, <vannapurve@google.com>,
	<chao.gao@intel.com>, <bharata@amd.com>, <nikunj@amd.com>,
	<michael.day@amd.com>, <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	<Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	<michael.roth@amd.com>, <aik@amd.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	<kalyazin@amazon.com>, <peterx@redhat.com>, <shivankg@amd.com>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 8/8] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: Add tests for mmap and NUMA policy support
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:24:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250408112402.181574-9-shivankg@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408112402.181574-1-shivankg@amd.com>

Add tests for memory mapping and NUMA memory policy binding in
guest_memfd. This extends the existing selftests by adding proper
validation for:
- Basic mmap() functionality
- KVM GMEM set_policy and get_policy() vm_ops functionality using
  mbind() and get_mempolicy()
- NUMA policy application before and after memory allocation

These tests help ensure NUMA support for guest_memfd works correctly.

Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c  | 86 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
index ce687f8d248f..2af6d0d8f091 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
 
 #include <linux/bitmap.h>
 #include <linux/falloc.h>
+#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
 
 #include "kvm_util.h"
 #include "test_util.h"
@@ -34,12 +36,86 @@ static void test_file_read_write(int fd)
 		    "pwrite on a guest_mem fd should fail");
 }
 
-static void test_mmap(int fd, size_t page_size)
+static void test_mmap(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
 {
 	char *mem;
 
-	mem = mmap(NULL, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem, MAP_FAILED);
+	mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmap should succeed");
+	TEST_ASSERT(munmap(mem, total_size) == 0, "munmap should succeed");
+}
+
+static void test_mbind(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
+{
+	unsigned long nodemask = 1; /* nid: 0 */
+	unsigned long maxnode = 8;
+	unsigned long get_nodemask;
+	int get_policy;
+	void *mem;
+	int ret;
+
+	mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmap for mbind test should succeed");
+
+	/* Test MPOL_INTERLEAVE policy */
+	ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem, page_size * 2, MPOL_INTERLEAVE,
+		      &nodemask, maxnode, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind with INTERLEAVE to node 0 should succeed");
+	ret = syscall(__NR_get_mempolicy, &get_policy, &get_nodemask,
+		      maxnode, mem, MPOL_F_ADDR);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret && get_policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE && get_nodemask == nodemask,
+		    "Policy should be MPOL_INTERLEAVE and nodes match");
+
+	/* Test basic MPOL_BIND policy */
+	ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem + page_size * 2, page_size * 2, MPOL_BIND,
+		      &nodemask, maxnode, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind with MPOL_BIND to node 0 should succeed");
+	ret = syscall(__NR_get_mempolicy, &get_policy, &get_nodemask,
+		      maxnode, mem + page_size * 2, MPOL_F_ADDR);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret && get_policy == MPOL_BIND && get_nodemask == nodemask,
+		    "Policy should be MPOL_BIND and nodes match");
+
+	/* Test MPOL_DEFAULT policy */
+	ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem, total_size, MPOL_DEFAULT, NULL, 0, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind with MPOL_DEFAULT should succeed");
+	ret = syscall(__NR_get_mempolicy, &get_policy, &get_nodemask,
+		      maxnode, mem, MPOL_F_ADDR);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret && get_policy == MPOL_DEFAULT && get_nodemask == 0,
+		    "Policy should be MPOL_DEFAULT and nodes zero");
+
+	/* Test with invalid policy */
+	ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem, page_size, 999, &nodemask, maxnode, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(ret == -1 && errno == EINVAL,
+		    "mbind with invalid policy should fail with EINVAL");
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(munmap(mem, total_size) == 0, "munmap should succeed");
+}
+
+static void test_numa_allocation(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
+{
+	unsigned long nodemask = 1;  /* Node 0 */
+	unsigned long maxnode = 8;
+	void *mem;
+	int ret;
+
+	mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmap should succeed");
+
+	/* Set NUMA policy after allocation */
+	ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, 0, page_size * 2);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate with aligned offset and size should succeed");
+	ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem, page_size * 2, MPOL_BIND, &nodemask,
+		      maxnode, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind should succeed");
+
+	/* Set NUMA policy before allocation */
+	ret = syscall(__NR_mbind, mem + page_size * 2, page_size, MPOL_BIND,
+		      &nodemask, maxnode, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "mbind should succeed");
+	ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, page_size * 2, page_size * 2);
+	TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate with aligned offset and size should succeed");
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(munmap(mem, total_size) == 0, "munmap should succeed");
 }
 
 static void test_file_size(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
@@ -190,7 +266,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, total_size, 0);
 
 	test_file_read_write(fd);
-	test_mmap(fd, page_size);
+	test_mmap(fd, page_size, total_size);
+	test_mbind(fd, page_size, total_size);
+	test_numa_allocation(fd, page_size, total_size);
 	test_file_size(fd, page_size, total_size);
 	test_fallocate(fd, page_size, total_size);
 	test_invalid_punch_hole(fd, page_size, total_size);
-- 
2.34.1



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08 11:23 [PATCH RFC v7 0/8] Add NUMA mempolicy support for KVM guest-memfd Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 11:23 ` [PATCH RFC v7 1/8] mm/filemap: Add mempolicy support to the filemap layer Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 11:23 ` [PATCH RFC v7 2/8] mm/mempolicy: Export memory policy symbols Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 11:23 ` [PATCH RFC v7 3/8] security: Export security_inode_init_security_anon for KVM guest_memfd Shivank Garg
2025-04-09 20:19   ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  6:07     ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-22 16:49       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-10  8:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-11  6:51     ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-22 17:25     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-08  6:37       ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 11:23 ` [PATCH RFC v7 4/8] KVM: Add kvm_gmem_exit() cleanup function Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 11:23 ` [PATCH RFC v7 5/8] KVM: guest_memfd: Make guest mem use guest mem inodes instead of anonymous inodes Shivank Garg
2025-04-10  8:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 13:53     ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-10 14:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-08 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v7 6/8] KVM: guest_memfd: Add slab-allocated inode cache Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 11:24 ` [PATCH RFC v7 7/8] KVM: guest_memfd: Enforce NUMA mempolicy using shared policy Shivank Garg
2025-04-10 13:40   ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-11  6:42     ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 11:24 ` Shivank Garg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250408112402.181574-9-shivankg@amd.com \
    --to=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kalyazin@amazon.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.day@amd.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox