From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] x86/mm/pat: (un)track_pfn_copy() fix + improvements
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 19:51:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250408025129.GA1168636@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_QgoB381ltKBdbG@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Good, although why is this compiler option named so weirdly in Clang:
>
> CC_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO_ENABLER := -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang
>
> Hopefully it is named thusly because Clang has adopted GCC's
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero?
Clang did -ftrivial-auto-var-init first, where the original author added
both pattern and zero but intended to remove zero once pattern has been
optimized enough compared to zero (if I remember and understand
correctly), so the "enabler" flag was added to try and make that clear.
Eventually, Kees leveraged both Linus's stated desire for initializing
stack variables [1] and GCC 12 landing -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
without a separate enable option to deprecate the "enabler" flag in
clang 16 [2] and remove it altogether in clang 18 [3].
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/CAHk-=wgTM+cN7zyUZacGQDv3DuuoA4LORNPWgb1Y_Z1p4iedNQ@mail.gmail.com/
[2]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aef03c9b3bed5cef5a1940774b80128aefcb4095
[3]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00e54d04ae2802d498741097d4b83e898bc99c5b
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-04 12:49 David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 14:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-06 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-07 7:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 16:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-07 18:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 18:33 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-04-07 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-08 2:51 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-04-08 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250408025129.GA1168636@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox