From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] mm: Fix apply_to_pte_range() vs lazy MMU mode
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:35:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407113543.6a43461e397d58471e407323@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1744037648.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 17:11:26 +0200 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> This series is an attempt to fix the violation of lazy MMU mode context
> requirement as described for arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode():
>
> This mode can only be entered and left under the protection of
> the page table locks for all page tables which may be modified.
>
> On s390 if I make arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_enable() and
> arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() -> preempt_disable() I am getting this:
>
> ...
>
Could you please reorganize this into two series? One series which
should be fast-tracked into 6.15-rcX and one series for 6.16-rc1?
And in the first series, please suggest whether its patches should be
backported into -stable and see if we can come up with suitable Fixes:
targets?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 15:11 Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] kasan: Avoid sleepable page allocation from atomic context Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-11 6:40 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-04-11 6:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-04-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] mm: Cleanup apply_to_pte_range() routine Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-11 6:46 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-04-14 14:17 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] mm: Protect kernel pgtables in apply_to_pte_range() Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-11 6:53 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-04-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] mm: Allow detection of wrong arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() context Alexander Gordeev
2025-04-11 7:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-04-07 18:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-04-11 7:12 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] mm: Fix apply_to_pte_range() vs lazy MMU mode Nicholas Piggin
2025-04-11 12:04 ` Alexander Gordeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250407113543.6a43461e397d58471e407323@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox