Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/mempolicy: Support dynamic sysfs updates for weighted interleave

[Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>]

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:33:51 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> Rakie Kim wrote:
> > Previously, the weighted interleave sysfs structure was statically
> > managed, preventing dynamic updates when nodes were added or removed.
> > 
> > This patch restructures the weighted interleave sysfs to support
> > dynamic insertion and deletion. The sysfs that was part of
> > the 'weighted_interleave_group' is now globally accessible,
> > allowing external access to that sysfs.
> > 
> > With this change, sysfs management for weighted interleave is
> > more flexible, supporting hotplug events and runtime updates
> > more effectively.
> 
> I understand the urge to try to make a general case for a patch, but it
> is better to state the explicit reason especially when someone is later
> reading the history and may not realize that this is part of a series.
> 
> So instead of making claims like "this is more flexible / more effective
> for runtime updates", state that motivation explicitly.  Something like:
> 
> "In preparation for enabling weighted-interleave sysfs attributes to
> react to node-online/offline events, introduce sysfs_wi_node_add() and
> sysfs_wi_node_delete() helpers to dynamically manage the
> weighted-interleave attributes.
> 
> A follow-on patch registers a memory-hotplug notifier to use these
> helpers, for now just refactor the current "publish all possible node"
> approach to use sysfs_wi_node_{add,delete}()."
> 

Hi Dan Williams,

Thank you for your response regarding this patch.

First, I would like to mention that this version is v3, and the latest
version is v5:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250402014906.1086-1-rakie.kim@sk.com/

However, I believe that all of your suggestions should also apply to v5,
and I completely agree with your feedback.

I will incorporate the improvements you proposed and prepare v6
accordingly.

Rakie