linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: stop prefetching the mmap semaphore on page faults
Date: Tue,  1 Apr 2025 16:35:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250401143520.1113572-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)

The prefetchw dates back decades and the fundamental notion of doing
something like this on a lock is shady.

Moreover, for few years now in the fast path faults are handled with RCU
+ per-vma locking, hopefully not even looking at the lock to begin with.

As such just remove it.

I did not see a point benchmarking this. Given that it is not expected
to be looked at by default justifies not doing the prefetch.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 296d294142c8..697432f63c59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 #include <linux/mmiotrace.h>		/* kmmio_handler, ...		*/
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>		/* perf_sw_event		*/
 #include <linux/hugetlb.h>		/* hstate_index_to_shift	*/
-#include <linux/prefetch.h>		/* prefetchw			*/
 #include <linux/context_tracking.h>	/* exception_enter(), ...	*/
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>		/* faulthandler_disabled()	*/
 #include <linux/efi.h>			/* efi_crash_gracefully_on_page_fault()*/
@@ -1496,8 +1495,6 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_RAW_ERRORCODE(exc_page_fault)
 
 	address = cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) ? fred_event_data(regs) : read_cr2();
 
-	prefetchw(&current->mm->mmap_lock);
-
 	/*
 	 * KVM uses #PF vector to deliver 'page not present' events to guests
 	 * (asynchronous page fault mechanism). The event happens when a
-- 
2.43.0



             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-01 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-01 14:35 Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2025-04-09  9:25 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250401143520.1113572-1-mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox