From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+1c486d0b62032c82a968@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: fix the racy usage of fs_struct->in_exec
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:09:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250325100936.GC29185@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGudoHE8AKKxvtw+e4KpOV5DuVcVdtTwO0XjaYSaFir+09gWhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/24, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 7:28 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > So to me it would be better to have the trivial fix for stable,
> > exactly because it is trivially backportable. Then cleanup/simplify
> > this logic on top of it.
>
> So I got myself a crap testcase with a CLONE_FS'ed task which can
> execve and sanity-checked that suid is indeed not honored as expected.
So you mean my patch can't fix the problem?
> Anyhow, the plan would be to serialize on the bit, synchronized with
> the current spin lock. copy_fs would call a helper to wait for it to
> clear, would still bump ->users under the spin lock.
>
> This would decouple the handling from cred_mutex and avoid weirdness
> like clearing the ->in_exec flag when we never set it.
I don't really understand the idea, but as I said I won't argue with
another solution.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 19:09 [syzbot] [fs?] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in bprm_execve / copy_fs (4) syzbot
2025-03-20 20:09 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-21 1:44 ` Al Viro
2025-03-21 8:10 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-21 8:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-21 8:45 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-22 1:00 ` Al Viro
2025-03-22 6:26 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-22 10:15 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-22 10:28 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-22 10:23 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-22 15:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-22 18:50 ` Al Viro
2025-03-23 18:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 20:57 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-24 16:00 ` [PATCH] exec: fix the racy usage of fs_struct->in_exec Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 17:01 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 18:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 22:24 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-25 10:09 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-03-25 11:01 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-25 13:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 13:30 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-25 14:15 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-25 14:46 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-25 18:40 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-29 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-04-29 16:57 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-29 17:12 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250325100936.GC29185@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+1c486d0b62032c82a968@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox