linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
To: <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
Cc: <AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@arm.com>, <Hasan.Maruf@amd.com>,
	<Michael.Day@amd.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<bharata@amd.com>, <dave.hansen@intel.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
	<dongjoo.linux.dev@gmail.com>, <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	<gourry@gourry.net>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <honggyu.kim@sk.com>,
	<hughd@google.com>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
	<k.shutemov@gmail.com>, <kbusch@meta.com>,
	<kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com>, <leesuyeon0506@gmail.com>,
	<leillc@google.com>, <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<mgorman@techsingularity.net>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<nadav.amit@gmail.com>, <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <riel@surriel.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
	<rppt@kernel.org>, <santosh.shukla@amd.com>, <shivankg@amd.com>,
	<shy828301@gmail.com>, <sj@kernel.org>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	<weixugc@google.com>, <willy@infradead.org>,
	<ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V1 13/13] prctl: Introduce new prctl to control scanning
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:30:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250319193028.29514-14-raghavendra.kt@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250319193028.29514-1-raghavendra.kt@amd.com>

 A new scalar value (PTEAScanScale) to control per task PTE A bit scanning is
introduced.

0    : scanning disabled
1-10 : scanning enabled.

In future PTEAScanScale could be used to control aggressiveness of scanning.

CC: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org 
CC: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
CC: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst |  2 ++
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c                 |  4 ++++
 include/linux/kmmscand.h           |  1 +
 include/linux/mm_types.h           |  3 +++
 include/uapi/linux/prctl.h         |  7 +++++++
 kernel/fork.c                      |  4 ++++
 kernel/sys.c                       | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/kmmscand.c                      |  5 +++++
 8 files changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
index 09f0aed5a08b..78633cab3f1a 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ read the file /proc/PID/status::
   VmLib:      1412 kB
   VmPTE:        20 kb
   VmSwap:        0 kB
+  PTEAScanScale: 0
   HugetlbPages:          0 kB
   CoreDumping:    0
   THP_enabled:	  1
@@ -278,6 +279,7 @@ It's slow but very precise.
  VmPTE                       size of page table entries
  VmSwap                      amount of swap used by anonymous private data
                              (shmem swap usage is not included)
+ PTEAScanScale               Integer representing async PTE A bit scan agrression
  HugetlbPages                size of hugetlb memory portions
  CoreDumping                 process's memory is currently being dumped
                              (killing the process may lead to a corrupted core)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index f02cd362309a..55620a5178fb 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
 		    " kB\nVmPTE:\t", mm_pgtables_bytes(mm) >> 10, 8);
 	SEQ_PUT_DEC(" kB\nVmSwap:\t", swap);
 	seq_puts(m, " kB\n");
+#ifdef CONFIG_KMMSCAND
+	seq_put_decimal_ull_width(m, "PTEAScanScale:\t", mm->pte_scan_scale, 8);
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
+#endif
 	hugetlb_report_usage(m, mm);
 }
 #undef SEQ_PUT_DEC
diff --git a/include/linux/kmmscand.h b/include/linux/kmmscand.h
index b120c65ee8c6..7021f7d979a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/kmmscand.h
+++ b/include/linux/kmmscand.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ static inline void kmmscand_execve(struct mm_struct *mm)
 
 static inline void kmmscand_fork(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm)
 {
+	mm->pte_scan_scale = oldmm->pte_scan_scale;
 	__kmmscand_enter(mm);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index eeaedc7473b1..12184e8ebc58 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -1018,6 +1018,9 @@ struct mm_struct {
 #ifdef CONFIG_KMMSCAND
 		/* Tracks promotion node. XXX: use nodemask */
 		int target_node;
+
+		/* Integer representing PTE A bit scan aggression (0-10) */
+		unsigned int pte_scan_scale;
  #endif
 		/*
 		 * An operation with batched TLB flushing is going on. Anything
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
index 5c6080680cb2..18face11440a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
@@ -353,4 +353,11 @@ struct prctl_mm_map {
  */
 #define PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS      76
 
+/* Set/get PTE A bit scan scale */
+#define PR_SET_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE		77
+#define PR_GET_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE		78
+# define PR_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE_MIN	0
+# define PR_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE_MAX	10
+# define PR_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE_DEFAULT	1
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index f61c55cf33c2..bfbbacb8ec36 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
 #include <uapi/linux/pidfd.h>
 #include <linux/pidfs.h>
 #include <linux/tick.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -1292,6 +1293,9 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
 	init_tlb_flush_pending(mm);
 #if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS)
 	mm->pmd_huge_pte = NULL;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_KMMSCAND
+	mm->pte_scan_scale = PR_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE_DEFAULT;
 #endif
 	mm_init_uprobes_state(mm);
 	hugetlb_count_init(mm);
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index cb366ff8703a..0518480d8f78 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -2142,6 +2142,19 @@ static int prctl_set_auxv(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#ifdef CONFIG_KMMSCAND
+static int prctl_pte_scan_scale_write(unsigned int scale)
+{
+	scale = clamp(scale, PR_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE_MIN, PR_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE_MAX);
+	current->mm->pte_scan_scale = scale;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int prctl_pte_scan_scale_read(void)
+{
+	return current->mm->pte_scan_scale;
+}
+#endif
 
 static int prctl_set_mm(int opt, unsigned long addr,
 			unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5)
@@ -2811,6 +2824,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
 			return -EINVAL;
 		error = arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(me, arg2);
 		break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_KMMSCAND
+	case PR_SET_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE:
+		if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		error = prctl_pte_scan_scale_write((unsigned int) arg2);
+		break;
+	case PR_GET_PTE_A_SCAN_SCALE:
+		if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		error = prctl_pte_scan_scale_read();
+		break;
+#endif
 	default:
 		trace_task_prctl_unknown(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
 		error = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/mm/kmmscand.c b/mm/kmmscand.c
index 38d7825c0d62..68ef2141c349 100644
--- a/mm/kmmscand.c
+++ b/mm/kmmscand.c
@@ -1113,6 +1113,11 @@ static unsigned long kmmscand_scan_mm_slot(void)
 		goto outerloop;
 	}
 
+	if (!mm->pte_scan_scale) {
+		next_mm = true;
+		goto outerloop;
+	}
+
 	mm_target_node = READ_ONCE(mm->target_node);
 	if (mm_target_node != mm_slot_target_node)
 		WRITE_ONCE(mm->target_node, mm_slot_target_node);
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19 19:30 [RFC PATCH V1 00/13] mm: slowtier page promotion based on PTE A bit Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 01/13] mm: Add kmmscand kernel daemon Raghavendra K T
2025-03-21 16:06   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-24 15:09     ` Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 02/13] mm: Maintain mm_struct list in the system Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 03/13] mm: Scan the mm and create a migration list Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 04/13] mm: Create a separate kernel thread for migration Raghavendra K T
2025-03-21 17:29   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-24 15:17     ` Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 05/13] mm/migration: Migrate accessed folios to toptier node Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 06/13] mm: Add throttling of mm scanning using scan_period Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 07/13] mm: Add throttling of mm scanning using scan_size Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 08/13] mm: Add initial scan delay Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 09/13] mm: Add heuristic to calculate target node Raghavendra K T
2025-03-21 17:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-03-24 16:17     ` Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 10/13] sysfs: Add sysfs support to tune scanning Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 11/13] vmstat: Add vmstat counters Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH V1 12/13] trace/kmmscand: Add tracing of scanning and migration Raghavendra K T
2025-03-19 19:30 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2025-03-19 23:00 ` [RFC PATCH V1 00/13] mm: slowtier page promotion based on PTE A bit Davidlohr Bueso
2025-03-20  8:51   ` Raghavendra K T
2025-03-20 19:11     ` Raghavendra K T
2025-03-21 20:35       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-03-25  6:36         ` Raghavendra K T
2025-03-20 21:50     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-03-21  6:48       ` Raghavendra K T
2025-03-21 15:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
     [not found] ` <20250321105309.3521-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23 18:14   ` [RFC PATCH V1 09/13] mm: Add heuristic to calculate target node Raghavendra K T
     [not found]   ` <20250324110543.3599-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-24 14:54     ` Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250319193028.29514-14-raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
    --to=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
    --cc=AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@arm.com \
    --cc=Hasan.Maruf@amd.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Michael.Day@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dongjoo.linux.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=k.shutemov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=kmanaouil.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=leesuyeon0506@gmail.com \
    --cc=leillc@google.com \
    --cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox