linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Clapinski <mclapinski@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Pasha Tatashin <tatashin@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/compaction: allow more aggressive proactive compaction
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 18:02:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250316180250.70767a305cea9798dcc7c9b8@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250127215020.4023545-1-mclapinski@google.com>

On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:50:18 +0100 Michal Clapinski <mclapinski@google.com> wrote:

> Our goal is to keep memory usage of a VM low on the host. For that
> reason, we use free page reporting which by default reports free pages
> of order 9 and larger to the host to be freed. The feature works well
> only if the memory in the guest is not fragmented below pages of order
> 9. Proactive compaction can be reused to achieve defragmentation after
> some parameter tweaking.
> 
> When the fragmentation score (lower is better) gets larger than the
> high watermark, proactive compaction kicks in. Compaction stops when
> the score goes below the low watermark (or no progress is made and
> backoff kicks in). Let's define the difference between high and low
> watermarks as leeway. Before these changes, the minimum possible value
> for low watermark was 5 and the leeway was hardcoded to 10 (so minimum
> possible value for high watermark was 15).
> 

I'm not seeing enthusiasm for these changes and a couple of comments
from myself remain unaddressed.  I'll drop the series - let's revisit
in the next -rc cycle, if you feel so motivated.




      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-27 21:50 Michal Clapinski
2025-01-27 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/compaction: remove low watermark cap for " Michal Clapinski
2025-01-28  1:17   ` Andrew Morton
2025-01-27 21:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/compaction: make proactive compaction high watermark configurable via sysctl Michal Clapinski
2025-01-28  1:18   ` Andrew Morton
2025-01-30 14:18     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-01-30 18:15       ` Michał Cłapiński
2025-01-28  1:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/compaction: allow more aggressive proactive compaction Andrew Morton
2025-03-17  1:02 ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250316180250.70767a305cea9798dcc7c9b8@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mclapinski@google.com \
    --cc=tatashin@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox