From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <howlett@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm/madvise: remove !tlb support from madvise_{dontneed,free}_single_vma()
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:02:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250311210211.85566-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <246b547e-d7ad-44c7-9652-6f5a72828b26@lucifer.local>
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:01:20 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:23:18AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > madvise_dontneed_single_vma() and madvise_free_single_vma() support both
> > batched tlb flushes and unbatched tlb flushes use cases depending on
> > received tlb parameter's value. The supports were for safe and fine
> > transition of the usages from the unbatched flushes to the batched ones.
> > Now the transition is done, and therefore there is no real unbatched tlb
> > flushes use case. Remove the code for supporting the no more being used
> > cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> Obviously I support this based on previous preview :) but I wonder if we
> can avoid this horrid caller_tlb pattern in the first instance.
I will try, though I have no good idea for that for now.
Maybe we could simply squash patches 7-9. I'm bit concerned if it makes
changes unnecessariy mixed and not small, but I have no strong opinion about
it. Please feel free to let me know if you want that.
>
> FWIW:
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Appreciate your reviews!
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 17:23 [PATCH 0/9] mm/madvise: batch tlb flushes for MADV_DONTNEED and MADV_FREE SeongJae Park
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm/madvise: use is_memory_failure() from madvise_do_behavior() SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 11:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm/madvise: split out populate behavior check logic SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 11:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm/madvise: deduplicate madvise_do_behavior() skip case handlings SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 12:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-11 20:54 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm/madvise: remove len parameter of madvise_do_behavior() SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 12:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm/madvise: define and use madvise_behavior struct for madvise_do_behavior() SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 12:17 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-11 20:56 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-12 5:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-12 17:23 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm/memory: split non-tlb flushing part from zap_page_range_single() SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 12:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-11 20:58 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-31 20:24 ` SeongJae Park
2025-04-01 1:45 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-04-01 2:48 ` SeongJae Park
2025-04-01 14:03 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-04-01 21:25 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm/madvise: let madvise_{dontneed,free}_single_vma() caller batches tlb flushes SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 13:07 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-11 21:00 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm/madvise: batch tlb flushes for [process_]madvise(MADV_{DONTNEED[_LOCKED],FREE}) SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 13:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-11 21:01 ` SeongJae Park
2025-04-01 21:17 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-10 17:23 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm/madvise: remove !tlb support from madvise_{dontneed,free}_single_vma() SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 14:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-11 21:02 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2025-03-12 13:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-01 21:22 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-10 22:39 ` [PATCH 0/9] mm/madvise: batch tlb flushes for MADV_DONTNEED and MADV_FREE Andrew Morton
2025-03-10 23:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-03-10 23:36 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-03-11 11:17 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-10 23:27 ` SeongJae Park
2025-03-11 12:49 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-03-11 21:03 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250311210211.85566-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=howlett@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox