From: Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@amazon.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>,
<jthoughton@google.com>, <peterx@redhat.com>, <graf@amazon.de>,
<jgowans@amazon.com>, <roypat@amazon.co.uk>, <derekmn@amazon.com>,
<nsaenz@amazon.es>, <xmarcalx@amazon.com>, <kalyazin@amazon.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] KVM: guest_memfd: support for uffd missing
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:30:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250303133011.44095-1-kalyazin@amazon.com> (raw)
This series is built on top of the v3 write syscall support [1].
With James's KVM userfault [2], it is possible to handle stage-2 faults
in guest_memfd in userspace. However, KVM itself also triggers faults
in guest_memfd in some cases, for example: PV interfaces like kvmclock,
PV EOI and page table walking code when fetching the MMIO instruction on
x86. It was agreed in the guest_memfd upstream call on 23 Jan 2025 [3]
that KVM would be accessing those pages via userspace page tables. In
order for such faults to be handled in userspace, guest_memfd needs to
support userfaultfd.
This series proposes a limited support for userfaultfd in guest_memfd:
- userfaultfd support is conditional to `CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM`
(as is fault support in general)
- Only `page missing` event is currently supported
- Userspace is supposed to respond to the event with the `write`
syscall followed by `UFFDIO_CONTINUE` ioctl to unblock the faulting
process. Note that we can't use `UFFDIO_COPY` here because
userfaulfd code does not know how to prepare guest_memfd pages, eg
remove them from direct map [4].
Not included in this series:
- Proper interface for userfaultfd to recognise guest_memfd mappings
- Proper handling of truncation cases after locking the page
Request for comments:
- Is it a sensible workflow for guest_memfd to resolve a userfault
`page missing` event with `write` syscall + `UFFDIO_CONTINUE`? One
of the alternatives is teaching `UFFDIO_COPY` how to deal with
guest_memfd pages.
- What is a way forward to make userfaultfd code aware of guest_memfd?
I saw that Patrick hit a somewhat similar problem in [5] when trying
to use direct map manipulation functions in KVM and was pointed by
David at Elliot's guestmem library [6] that might include a shim for that.
Would the library be the right place to expose required interfaces like
`vma_is_gmem`?
Nikita
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20250303130838.28812-1-kalyazin@amazon.com/T/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20250109204929.1106563-1-jthoughton@google.com/T/
[3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M6766BzdY1Lhk7LiR5IqVR8B8mG3cr-cxTxOrAosPOk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.w1126rgli5e3
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20250221160728.1584559-1-roypat@amazon.co.uk/T/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20250221160728.1584559-1-roypat@amazon.co.uk/T/#ma130b29c130dbdc894aa08d8d56c16ec383f36dd
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20241122-guestmem-library-v5-2-450e92951a15@quicinc.com/T/
Nikita Kalyazin (5):
KVM: guest_memfd: add kvm_gmem_vma_is_gmem
KVM: guest_memfd: add support for uffd missing
mm: userfaultfd: allow to register userfaultfd for guest_memfd
mm: userfaultfd: support continue for guest_memfd
KVM: selftests: add uffd missing test for guest_memfd
include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 9 ++
mm/userfaultfd.c | 23 ++++-
.../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 17 +++-
virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
base-commit: 592e7531753dc4b711f96cd1daf808fd493d3223
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 13:30 Nikita Kalyazin [this message]
2025-03-03 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] KVM: guest_memfd: add kvm_gmem_vma_is_gmem Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-03 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] KVM: guest_memfd: add support for uffd missing Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-03 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: userfaultfd: allow to register userfaultfd for guest_memfd Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-03 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] mm: userfaultfd: support continue " Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-03 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] KVM: selftests: add uffd missing test " Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-03 21:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] KVM: guest_memfd: support for uffd missing Peter Xu
2025-03-05 19:35 ` James Houghton
2025-03-05 20:29 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-10 18:12 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-10 19:57 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-11 16:56 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-12 15:45 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-12 17:07 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-12 19:32 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-13 15:25 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-13 19:12 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-13 22:13 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-13 22:38 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-14 17:12 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-03-14 18:32 ` Peter Xu
2025-03-14 20:04 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250303133011.44095-1-kalyazin@amazon.com \
--to=kalyazin@amazon.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=derekmn@amazon.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.de \
--cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=nsaenz@amazon.es \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=xmarcalx@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox