From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CC3C021A4 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5C3606B007B; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:42:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 54C456B0096; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:42:02 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3ED6B6B0098; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:42:02 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23456B007B for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:42:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12801A3BCB for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:42:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83155102800.28.0021F65 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DBB1A000D for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=UO5sOIvM; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=Qbjrieea; spf=pass (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of t-8ch@linutronix.de designates 193.142.43.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=t-8ch@linutronix.de; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linutronix.de ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1740408118; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=6mAXD3d7SVkEBPMMGWlw14ZoV+EKwPAHA+II9d9aXBQD5jUIkdlETNVhZjBswjYEGpUs4x lu9TrCXU5RxaxtTLQTp4dHxu6AViMg/pSwJH9TXxIZlMYlq9WdonXqDK83Jz+WU1a0RYiA bATrOMHcJVUjVxpyz4B2zoDdmIFEDwQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=UO5sOIvM; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=Qbjrieea; spf=pass (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of t-8ch@linutronix.de designates 193.142.43.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=t-8ch@linutronix.de; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linutronix.de ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1740408118; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=qst4I5C+fBiRdrcq+Nq/EQ/MFz4i7PJXz7K31DJjAFU=; b=6WnL36vAfwN3Y0S9dSYa1LTGxwu2OgB5wQ3oFKZAOinfE7cI6hi33KtyBsYStrj4FC2cR6 tkhHY1z44FUHMXdV8X9WFv4gxj2lgTLv3gT8sbUZkZt8Pn66WQSm2tDatSZ6x88GAu0p3c Gmh6TcWw1eepNriULZhIdIjEpe08P5Q= Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:41:54 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1740408114; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qst4I5C+fBiRdrcq+Nq/EQ/MFz4i7PJXz7K31DJjAFU=; b=UO5sOIvMo27SCcl5POLOdN17FEhJ0IBgsA7p2uvWdvO68GV/epYCwlnRvfpdIqPfanoye9 gDuV2rTCT4L/v0B483f+Tooa9PWQZkflWvhGWMqoV3nDZWR4amjej3fiCwp5aXEV5WeBY/ dTRd+htXaG3dKkRlRIsSPgFCsv+Z9AiGAHdGqyVnQUxQ988OfFG1qP9RSFUTwxpypoBXEQ ofjnc7f/5oIyf6Zxyyt5osGbUcVZXBC1bjwVcgJlHXoX/tt1Fy8ZcWa8EX/BdU627zUBeQ mgWZCpskA8Bk7LgEEyif941cqiwtZ7TU7yIo66WCmJVH21A20nbFwExqb8Ybwg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1740408114; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qst4I5C+fBiRdrcq+Nq/EQ/MFz4i7PJXz7K31DJjAFU=; b=QbjrieeakqbpTtJLYrgh+XbLfbcXlPWmdp7e1sIe4Vm4Th4/Erub8o+eEw/cokEU7ibNLd UVmELv+QdQLQSXBg== From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Kees Cook , Eric Biederman , Shuah Khan , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Vincenzo Frascino , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] selftests: vDSO: parse_vdso: Make compatible with nolibc Message-ID: <20250224154007-bb3ab855-7a9d-43ba-851c-054a5c4fe324@linutronix.de> References: <20250203-parse_vdso-nolibc-v1-0-9cb6268d77be@linutronix.de> <20250203-parse_vdso-nolibc-v1-13-9cb6268d77be@linutronix.de> <20250222102426.GA13708@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250222102426.GA13708@1wt.eu> X-Stat-Signature: 61uzwcet1wgjjfiqiftp8df5r8191bnk X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 02DBB1A000D X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1740408116-123988 X-HE-Meta: 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 XRK/Ttqj L9a3wK+xvLYQC1kfoiga3F2TybSTMr9OxCo7qe6Kp9OFqC8K7aiEgWfQ6zV08g/MMdgl2GiAVC8ZoRuX9mJqVx06VYcr9enGAhqgO5seO8KN2TnvsDWDq2k4JQVoZYPoCxEix5y+QOLgXl60bQC8Rm1/ZhQlavbt/mPMrrS8iAMl4c7vE8+7hW0zgkn1mngb4qF1gu6Rnrso74ARhR7Ti8veY4KG3qaf8bW2fC4/6cCZuVXDWlJBUD4IslHsmtqD+IAVkFxekcBf1j1xRVa1wMdEGqPWFCjTVba47G4Un7weEVsj2gg+j9oF0Q1aWR1yqlfZnJyRBErhxCkz/gSodkJjm0ubUzBHdBEu8ig9+HnKczPeTVHO+cAUgbgFrWRMVHSowgm+bUn/HlSJN6QfzMQEqqR+YNJtrhCZsUqfnoIKCsGqgSxmruielnAMqS2qvF0O+ X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 11:24:26AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:05:14AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > nolibc does not provide this header, instead its definitions are > > available unconditionally. > > Please think about reminding which one you're talking about so that a > simple "git log" shows what header you're talking about (limits.h) > without requiring to also see the patch itself. Ack. > BTW, I think that limits.h is common enough that we could probably > provide it as well with nolibc to ease porting (and the current patch > is a good example of this). Maybe it could simply start by including > stdint.h to provide the various limits we rely on. I remember that in > the early days of nolibc-test we had to exclude it as well for nolibc. > > What do you think? The less we need to patch programs to insert #ifndef > NOLIBC, the better. Sounds good, I'll do that for v2. Given that any nolibc header always also includes the global nolibc.h, I think limits.h can directly include nolibc.h. > Cheers, > Willy