linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
	Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] zram: sleepable entry locking
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:08:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250212160830.730a199935e907c2498b28d4@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250212063153.179231-2-senozhatsky@chromium.org>

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:26:59 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:

> Concurrent modifications of meta table entries is now handled
> by per-entry spin-lock.  This has a number of shortcomings.
> 
> First, this imposes atomic requirements on compression backends.
> zram can call both zcomp_compress() and zcomp_decompress() under
> entry spin-lock, which implies that we can use only compression
> algorithms that don't schedule/sleep/wait during compression and
> decompression.  This, for instance, makes it impossible to use
> some of the ASYNC compression algorithms (H/W compression, etc.)
> implementations.
> 
> Second, this can potentially trigger watchdogs.  For example,
> entry re-compression with secondary algorithms is performed
> under entry spin-lock.  Given that we chain secondary
> compression algorithms and that some of them can be configured
> for best compression ratio (and worst compression speed) zram
> can stay under spin-lock for quite some time.
> 
> Having a per-entry mutex (or, for instance, a rw-semaphore)
> significantly increases sizeof() of each entry and hence the
> meta table.  Therefore entry locking returns back to bit
> locking, as before, however, this time also preempt-rt friendly,
> because if waits-on-bit instead of spinning-on-bit.  Lock owners
> are also now permitted to schedule, which is a first step on the
> path of making zram non-atomic.
> 
> ...
>
> -static int zram_slot_trylock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
> +static void zram_slot_lock_init(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
>  {
> -	return spin_trylock(&zram->table[index].lock);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +	lockdep_init_map(&zram->table[index].lockdep_map, "zram-entry->lock",
> +			 &zram->table_lockdep_key, 0);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
>  
> ...
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> +	lockdep_register_key(&zram->table_lockdep_key);
> +#endif
> +

Please check whether all the ifdefs are needed - some of these things
have CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n stubs.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-12  6:26 [PATCH v5 00/18] zsmalloc/zram: there be preemption Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:26 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] zram: sleepable entry locking Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13  0:08   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-02-13  0:52     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13  1:42       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13  8:49         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] zram: permit preemption with active compression stream Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 16:01   ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13  1:04     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] zram: remove crypto include Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 16:13   ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13  0:53     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] zram: remove max_comp_streams device attr Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] zram: remove two-staged handle allocation Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] zram: remove writestall zram_stats member Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] zram: limit max recompress prio to num_active_comps Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] zram: filter out recomp targets based on priority Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] zram: rework recompression loop Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] zsmalloc: factor out pool locking helpers Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 16:18   ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-12 16:19     ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13  0:57     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13  1:12       ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13  2:54         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] zsmalloc: factor out size-class " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] zsmalloc: make zspage lock preemptible Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12 17:14   ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13  1:20     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13  1:31       ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-13  1:53         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13 11:32   ` Hillf Danton
2025-02-13 12:29     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] zsmalloc: introduce new object mapping API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] zram: switch to new zsmalloc " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] zram: permit reclaim in zstd custom allocator Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] zram: do not leak page on recompress_store error path Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] zram: do not leak page on writeback_store " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-12  6:27 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] zram: add might_sleep to zcomp API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-13  0:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] zsmalloc/zram: there be preemption Andrew Morton
2025-02-13  0:51   ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250212160830.730a199935e907c2498b28d4@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox