From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] may miss to set node dead on destroy
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:55:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250212005536.6j4shtwswsyaapwm@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <qtgphm6l4jd3tzrdy2jt5envy3padolzkbjydx6uizomkisq6p@gcfaosnjdgo4>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:28:53AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [250211 03:11]:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:31:28AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [250207 20:26]:
>> >
>> >The subject of this patch set makes the issue sound much more sever than
>> >it is. It currently sounds like a memory leak or a UAF, which isn't the
>> >case.
>> >
>>
>> Not intend to exaggerate the impact.
>>
>> Is this one would be better?
>>
>> maple_tree: make sure each node is dead on destroy
>
>Not really, you are fixing two nodes, one isn't even to do with the
>destry/dead node. You are also not making sure each node is dead, but
>fixing an issue with the leaf node.
>
>maple_tree: Fix the replacement of a root leaf node ?
>
One more question, would it be better to use this as the subject of patch 1?
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-12 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-08 1:18 Wei Yang
2025-02-08 1:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] maple_tree: " Wei Yang
2025-02-10 14:19 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-11 7:48 ` Wei Yang
2025-02-11 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-12 0:26 ` Wei Yang
2025-02-08 1:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] maple_tree: restart walk on correct status Wei Yang
2025-02-10 14:20 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-08 1:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] maple_tree: assert retrieving new value on a tree with only root node Wei Yang
2025-02-10 14:18 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-11 8:02 ` Wei Yang
2025-02-11 15:25 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-12 0:41 ` Wei Yang
2025-02-10 14:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] may miss to set node dead on destroy Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-11 8:11 ` Wei Yang
2025-02-11 15:28 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-12 0:49 ` Wei Yang
2025-02-12 0:55 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2025-03-04 12:07 ` Wei Yang
2025-03-04 14:45 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-03-05 0:32 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250212005536.6j4shtwswsyaapwm@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox