Re: [PATCH 3/3] maple_tree: assert retrieving new value on a tree with only root node

[Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:25:27AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [250211 03:02]:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:18:53AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [250207 20:26]:
>> >> Original code may get a stall value when overwriting the whole range on a
>> >                          ^^^^^- stale value.  I thought you were saying
>> >			  it was stalling which did not make sense.
>> >
>> 
>> I want to say we don't get the new value as we expect.
>> 
>> How about:
>> 
>> Original code may not get the new value after overwriting the whole range on a
>> maple tree with only root node.
>
>That's more clear than what you had before.  Usually you try to
>concentrate on what you did, not what was there.

Thanks, I didn't notice it. Will pay attention to it.

>
>Ensure the new value is returned when overwriting a tree containing just
>a leaf node.
>
>> 
>> >> maple tree with only root node. The reason is we didn't set the only
>> >> root node dead during destroy.
>> >> 
>> >> Add a test case to verify this is not recreated.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> >> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >> 
>> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
>> >> index bc30050227fd..1e293e4d856d 100644
>> >> --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
>> >> +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
>> >> @@ -35256,6 +35256,30 @@ static noinline void __init check_rcu_simulated(struct maple_tree *mt)
>> >>  	MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_prev(&mas_reader, 0) != xa_mk_value(val));
>> >>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>> >>  
>> >> +	/* Clear out tree & create one with only root node */
>> >> +	mas_lock(&mas_writer);
>> >> +	mas_set_range(&mas_writer, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> >> +	mas_store_gfp(&mas_writer, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> +	mas_set_range(&mas_writer, 0, 0);
>> >> +	for (i = 0; i <= 5; i++) {
>> >> +		mas_writer.index = i * 10;
>> >> +		mas_writer.last = i * 10 + 5;
>> >> +		mas_store_gfp(&mas_writer, xa_mk_value(i), GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> +	}
>> >> +	mas_unlock(&mas_writer);
>> >> +	target = 10;
>> >> +	mas_set_range(&mas_reader, target, target);
>> >> +	rcu_read_lock();
>> >> +	MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_walk(&mas_reader) != xa_mk_value(target/10));
>> >> +
>> >> +	/* Overwrite the whole range */
>> >> +	mas_lock(&mas_writer);
>> >> +	mas_set_range(&mas_writer, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> >> +	mas_store_gfp(&mas_writer, xa_mk_value(val), GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> +	mas_unlock(&mas_writer);
>> >> +	MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_walk(&mas_reader) != xa_mk_value(val));
>> >> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>> >> +
>> >>  	rcu_unregister_thread();
>> >>  }
>> >>  
>> >> -- 
>> >> 2.34.1
>> >> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me