From: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yaozhenguo1@gmail.com,
muchun.song@linux.dev
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
rppt@kernel.org, luizcap@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: avoid fallback for specific node allocation of 1G pages
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:48:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211034856.629371-1-luizcap@redhat.com> (raw)
When using the HugeTLB kernel command-line to allocate 1G pages from
a specific node, such as:
default_hugepagesz=1G hugepages=1:1
If node 1 happens to not have enough memory for the requested number of
1G pages, the allocation falls back to other nodes. A quick way to
reproduce this is by creating a KVM guest with a memory-less node and
trying to allocate 1 1G page from it. Instead of failing, the allocation
will fallback to other nodes.
This defeats the purpose of node specific allocation. Also, specific
node allocation for 2M pages don't have this behavior: the allocation
will just fail for the pages it can't satisfy.
This issue happens because HugeTLB calls memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
for 1G boot-time allocation as this function falls back to other nodes
if the allocation can't be satisfied. Use memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw()
instead, which ensures that the allocation will only be satisfied from
the specified node.
Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 65068671e460..163190e89ea1 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3145,7 +3145,7 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
/* do node specific alloc */
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
- m = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
+ m = memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
if (!m)
return 0;
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 3:48 Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2025-02-11 9:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-02-11 14:51 ` Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-11 16:49 ` Frank van der Linden
2025-02-11 13:49 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250211034856.629371-1-luizcap@redhat.com \
--to=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=yaozhenguo1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox